ArticlePloS one2023
Dynamic sub-route-based self-adaptive beam search Q-learning algorithm for traveling salesman problem.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this paper, a dynamic sub-route-based self-adaptive beam search Q-learning (DSRABSQL) algorithm is proposed that provides a reinforcement learning (RL) framework combined with local search to solve the traveling salesman problem (TSP). DSRABSQL builds upon the Q-learning (QL) algorithm. Considering its problems of slow convergence and low accuracy, four strategies within the QL framework are designed first: the weighting function-based reward matrix, the power function-based initial Q-table, a self-adaptive ε-beam search strategy, and a new Q-value update formula. Then, a self-adaptive beam search Q-learning (ABSQL) algorithm is designed. To solve the problem that the sub-route is not fully optimized in the ABSQL algorithm, a dynamic sub-route optimization strategy is introduced outside the QL framework, and then the DSRABSQL algorithm is designed. Experiments are conducted to compare QL, ABSQL, DSRABSQL, our previously proposed variable neighborhood discrete whale optimization algorithm, and two advanced reinforcement learning algorithms. The experimental results show that DSRABSQL significantly outperforms the other algorithms. In addition, two groups of algorithms are designed based on the QL and DSRABSQL algorithms to test the effectiveness of the five strategies. From the experimental results, it can be found that the dynamic sub-route optimization strategy and self-adaptive ε-beam search strategy contribute the most for small-, medium-, and large-scale instances. At the same time, collaboration exists between the four strategies within the QL framework, which increases with the expansion of the instance scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.