Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36943762›Full record

ReviewIndustrial & engineering chemistry research2023

Ozone Decontamination of Medical and Nonmedical Devices: An Assessment of Design and Implementation Considerations.

Emmanuel I Epelle, Andrew Macfarlane, Michael Cusack, Anthony Burns, Jude A Okolie, Parag Vichare, Luc Rolland, Mohammed Yaseen

Open access · hybridFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Industrial & engineering chemistry research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Glucose-Assisted Synthesis of InNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. InNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Next-Generation Eco-Friendly Hybrid Air Purifier: Ag/TiOInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Use of Ozone for Disinfection of PHARMODUCTPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Emmanuel I EpelleSchool of Computing, Engineering & Physical Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley PA1 2BE, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9494-746X
Andrew MacfarlaneACS Clothing, 6 Dovecote Road Central Point Logistics Park, Centralpark ML1 4GP, United Kingdom.
Michael CusackACS Clothing, 6 Dovecote Road Central Point Logistics Park, Centralpark ML1 4GP, United Kingdom.
Anthony BurnsACS Clothing, 6 Dovecote Road Central Point Logistics Park, Centralpark ML1 4GP, United Kingdom.
Jude A OkolieGallogly College of Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, United States of America.
Parag VichareSchool of Computing, Engineering & Physical Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley PA1 2BE, United Kingdom.
Luc RollandSchool of Computing, Engineering & Physical Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley PA1 2BE, United Kingdom.
Mohammed YaseenSchool of Computing, Engineering & Physical Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley PA1 2BE, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2460-1893
University of the West of Scotland · GBUniversity of Oklahoma · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The control of infectious diseases can be improved via carefully designed decontamination equipment and systems. Research interest in ozone (a powerful antimicrobial agent) has significantly increased over the past decade. The COVID-19 pandemic has also instigated the development of new ozone-based technologies for the decontamination of personal protective equipment, surfaces, materials, and indoor environments. As this interest continues to grow, it is necessary to consider key factors affecting the applicability of lab-based findings to large-scale systems utilizing ozone. In this review, we present recent developments on the critical factors affecting the successful deployments of industrial ozone technologies. Some of these include the medium of application (air or water), material compatibility, efficient circulation and extraction, measurement and control, automation, scalability, and process economics. We also provide a comparative assessment of ozone relative to other decontamination methods/sterilization technologies and further substantiate the necessity for increased developments in gaseous and aqueous ozonation. Modeling methodologies, which can be applied for the design and implementation of ozone contacting systems, are also presented in this review. Key knowledge gaps and open research problems/opportunities are extensively covered including our recommendations for the development of novel solutions with industrial importance.

Identifiers

PMID36943762
PMCPMC10020969
OpenAlexW4322726533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read14
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.