Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36943478›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2023

Gender representation at scientific congresses: focus on functional and female urology-a study from the EAU Young Academic Urologist Functional Urology Group.

Tanja Hüsch, Nadir I Osman, François Herve, Mehmet G Culha, Luís Vale, Antonio Tienza, Manuela Tutolo, Sabrina De Cillis, Cyrille Guillot-Tantay, Véronique Phé and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Gender Disparities in Interventional Pain Medicine: Representation, Leadership, and Compensation.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. A Keynote Address: A Guide to Supporting Conference Speakers with Lived Experience of Cleft Lip and/or Palate.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tanja HüschDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany. Tanjahuesch@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7872-5496
Nadir I OsmanRoyal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
François HerveDepartment of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Mehmet G CulhaUniversity of Health Sciences, Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Luís ValeDepartment of Urology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal.
Antonio TienzaUrology Department, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Palma, Spain.
Manuela TutoloDivision of Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Sabrina De CillisDivision of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, TO, Italy.
Cyrille Guillot-TantayHôpital Foch, Service d'Urologie, Suresnes, France.
Véronique PhéDepartment of Urology, Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Tenon Academic Hospital, Paris, France.
EAU Young Academic Urologist Functional Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFemale representation at scientific conferences is crucial for encouraging women pursuing an academic career. Nevertheless, gender inequity at urological conferences is common place and women are often stereotyped choosing functional urology. However, there is no evidence whether female representation is higher in functional urology. This investigations aims to analyze gender representation at functional urology sessions.

methodsNational and international urological congresses between 2019 and 2021 with a focus on functional urology and female urology sessions were evaluated. Congresses were categorized as national or international. Session type, topic, gender of chairs and speakers of the identified sessions were recorded. In addition, affiliation and medical specialty were collected for chairs.

resultsA total of 29 congresses were evaluated. Out of a total of 2893 chairs and speakers, 1034 (35.7%) were women and 1839 (63.6%) were men. This represents an overall gender gap of 27.9% for functional urology sessions. No significant differences in gender representation between national and international congresses could be identified (p = 0.076). When considering gender distribution of chairs, the gap was more pronounced by 35.5%. Furthermore, men were more likely to be invited to be a speaker in plenary and podiums sessions.

conclusionsGender inequality is present in functional urology sessions. There is a need for greater efforts to achieve gender equality. An important step to remedy the situation is the inclusion of women in scientific program committees. Furthermore, support by the leadership of urological societies and academic departments is essential to herald a lasting change in gender inequality.

Indexed as

Physicians, WomenUrologyFemaleHumansMaleOrganizationsSocieties, MedicalUrologistsFemale urologyFunctional urologyGender gapUrologyWomen

Identifiers

PMID36943478
PMCPMC10188577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.