ArticleJournal of anesthesia2023
Influence of maternal position during combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for labor analgesia on technical difficulties and complications.
Article in Journal of anesthesia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeGenerally, combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) for labor analgesia is performed in the lateral or sitting position; however, only few studies have investigated the effect of maternal position on labor analgesia induction. We aimed to retrospectively assess the influence of maternal position on induction time and complications.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed anesthetic and medical records regarding labor analgesia in 201 parturients treated between January 2019 and November 2019. Patients were classified into 2 groups based on their position (sitting or lateral) during induction. The primary outcome was the time required for CSEA induction. We compared 2 groups on the primary outcome and the occurrences of other complications during CSEA induction using hyperbaric bupivacaine. Moreover, we performed multiple linear regression analysis to identify independent factors associated with induction time.
resultsThere was no significant between-group difference in the time required for induction. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed an independent association of the distance from the skin to the epidural space with the time required for induction. The lateral group had a significantly higher incidence of paresthesia than the sitting group (P = 0.028). The lateral group had a significantly higher ephedrine requirement (P < 0.001) than the sitting group.
conclusionMaternal position was not associated with the time required for CSEA induction. However, the sitting group had a lower paresthesia occurrence and ephedrine requirement than the lateral group. Other technical complications were not associated with maternal position during CSEA induction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.