Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36943414›Full record

ReviewAnnals of biomedical engineering2023

Flexible Needle Steering with Tethered and Untethered Actuation: Current States, Targeting Errors, Challenges and Opportunities.

Mingyue Lu, Yongde Zhang, Chwee Ming Lim, Hongliang Ren

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Mingyue LuThe Key Laboratory of Advanced Manufacturing and Intelligent Technology, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4809-227X
Yongde ZhangThe Key Laboratory of Advanced Manufacturing and Intelligent Technology, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin, China.
Chwee Ming LimThe Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Hongliang RenThe Department of Electronic Engineering and the Shun Hing Institute of Advanced Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. hren@cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6488-1551
Harbin University of Science and Technology · CNNational University of Singapore · SGSingapore General Hospital · SG

Funding

China Scholarship Council CSC 202108230187General Research Fund 14216022General Research Fund N_CUHK.420/22GRS #3110167#3110137Hong Kong Research Grants Council (RGC) Collaborative Research Fund C4063-18G: 2300056Hong Kong Research Grants Council (RGC) Collaborative Research Fund CRF C4026-21GF: 2300075National Medical Research Council Clinician Scientist grant NMRC CSA-MOH-000326Reserve Leader Funding Project of Leading Talent Echelon of Heilongjiang Province of China No. 2501050628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate needle targeting is critical for many clinical procedures, such as transcutaneous biopsy or radiofrequency ablation of tumors. However, targeting errors may arise, limiting the widespread adoption of these procedures. Advances in flexible needle (FN) steering are emerging to mitigate these errors. This review summarizes the state-of-the-art developments of FNs and addresses possible targeting errors that can be overcome with steering actuation techniques. FN steering techniques can be classified as passive and active. Passive steering directly results from the needle-tissue interaction forces, whereas active steering requires additional forces to be applied at the needle tip, which enhances needle steerability. Therefore, the corresponding targeting errors of most passive FNs and active FNs are between 1 and 2 mm, and less than 1 mm, respectively. However, the diameters of active FNs range from 1.42 to 12 mm, which is larger than the passive steering needle varying from 0.5 to 1.4 mm. Therefore, the development of active FNs is an area of active research. These active FNs can be steered using tethered internal direct actuation or untethered external actuation. Examples of tethered internal direct actuation include tendon-driven, longitudinal segment transmission and concentric tube transmission. Tendon-driven FNs have various structures, and longitudinal segment transmission needles could be adapted to reduce tissue damage. Additionally, concentric tube needles have immediate advantages and clinical applications in natural orifice surgery. Magnetic actuation enables active FN steering with untethered external actuation and facilitates miniaturization. The challenges faced in the fabrication, sensing, and actuation methods of FN are analyzed. Finally, bio-inspired FNs may offer solutions to address the challenges faced in FN active steering mechanisms.

Indexed as

NeedlesBiopsyMiniaturizationPhantoms, ImagingActive steeringFlexible needleSteering mechanismsTargeting errorsUntethered external actuation

Identifiers

PMID36943414
OpenAlexW4328048675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.