Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36943340›Full record

ArticleInteractive journal of medical research2023

Postgraduate-Year-1 Residents' Perceptions of Social Media and Virtual Applicant Recruitment: Cross-sectional Survey Study.

Daniel L Plack, Arnoley S Abcejo, Molly B Kraus, J Ross Renew, Timothy R Long, Emily E Sharpe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interactive journal of medical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel L PlackDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7796-2430
Arnoley S AbcejoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3838-5287
Molly B KrausDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5738-0110
J Ross RenewDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9389-6413
Timothy R LongDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5231-1252
Emily E SharpeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4232-0718

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe dissemination of information about residency programs is a vital step in residency recruitment. Traditional methods of distributing information have been printed brochures, websites, in-person interviews, and increasingly, social media. Away rotations and in-person interviews were cancelled, and interviews were virtual for the first time during the COVID-19 pandemic.

objectiveThe purpose of our study was to describe postgraduate-year-1 (PGY1) residents' social media habits in regard to residency recruitment and their perceptions of the residency programs' social media accounts in light of the transition to virtual interviews.

methodsA web-based 33-question survey was developed to evaluate personal social media use, perceptions of social media use by residency programs, and perceptions of the residency program content. Surveys were sent in 2021 to PGY1 residents at Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota who participated in the 2020-2021 interview cycle.

resultsOf the 31 program directors contacted, 22 (71%) provided permission for their residents to complete the survey. Of 219 residents who received the survey, 67 (30%) completed the survey. Most respondents applied to a single specialty, and greater than 61% (41/67) of respondents applied to more than 30 programs. The social media platforms used most regularly by the respondents were Instagram (42/67, 63%), Facebook (36/67, 54%), and Twitter (22/67, 33%). Respondents used the program website (66/67, 99%), residents (47/67, 70%), and social media (43/67, 64%) as the most frequent resources to research programs. The most commonly used social media platforms to research programs were Instagram (38/66, 58%), Twitter (22/66, 33%), and Doximity (20/66, 30%). The type of social media post ranked as most interesting by the respondents was "resident life outside of the hospital." In addition, 68% (39/57) of the respondents agreed or strongly agreed that their perception of a program was positively influenced by the residency program's social media account.

conclusionsIn this multispecialty survey of PGY1 residents participating in the 2020-2021 virtual interview season, respondents preferred Instagram to Twitter or Facebook for gathering information on prospective residency programs. In addition, the program website, current residents, and social media platforms were the top-ranked resources used by prospective applicants. Having an up-to-date website and robust social media presence, particularly on Instagram, may become increasingly important in the virtual interview environment.

Indexed as

COVID-19disseminationInstagrammedical educationresidencyresidency programresidency recruitmentresident matchsocial mediaTwittervirtual interview

Identifiers

PMID36943340
PMCPMC10131859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.