Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36943168›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2023

Estimating Phosphene Locations Using Eye Movements of Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis Users.

Samuel A Titchener, Jeroen Goossens, Jessica Kvansakul, David A X Nayagam, Maria Kolic, Elizabeth K Baglin, Lauren N Ayton, Carla J Abbott, Chi D Luu, Nick Barnes and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03406416 (Evaluation of a Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03406416 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of a Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: A 44 Channel Fully Implantable Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorMobius Medical Pty Ltd.Ran2018 to 2020Enrolled4ConditionsRetinitis Pigmentosa, ChoroideremiaArms44Ch Bionic Eye Device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Samuel A TitchenerBionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Jeroen GoossensDonders Institute for Brain Cognition and Behaviour, Radboudumc, the Netherlands.
Jessica KvansakulBionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
David A X NayagamBionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Maria KolicCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Elizabeth K BaglinCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Lauren N AytonCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Carla J AbbottCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Chi D LuuCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Nick BarnesData61, CSIRO, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
William G KentlerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Mohit N ShivdasaniGraduate School of Biomedical Engineering, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
Penelope J AllenCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Matthew A PetoeBionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AUBionics Institute · AUCentre for Eye Research Australia · AUAustralian National University · AUHersenstichting · NLUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Accurate mapping of phosphene locations from visual prostheses is vital to encode spatial information. This process may involve the subject pointing to evoked phosphene locations with their finger. Here, we demonstrate phosphene mapping for a retinal implant using eye movements and compare it with retinotopic electrode positions and previous results using conventional finger-based mapping. Methods: Three suprachoroidal retinal implant recipients (NCT03406416) indicated the spatial position of phosphenes. Electrodes were stimulated individually, and the subjects moved their finger (finger based) or their eyes (gaze based) to the perceived phosphene location. The distortion of the measured phosphene locations from the expected locations (retinotopic electrode locations) was characterized with Procrustes analysis. Results: The finger-based phosphene locations were compressed spatially relative to the expected locations all three subjects, but preserved the general retinotopic arrangement (scale factors ranged from 0.37 to 0.83). In two subjects, the gaze-based phosphene locations were similar to the expected locations (scale factors of 0.72 and 0.99). For the third subject, there was no apparent relationship between gaze-based phosphene locations and electrode locations (scale factor of 0.07). Conclusions: Gaze-based phosphene mapping was achievable in two of three tested retinal prosthesis subjects and their derived phosphene maps correlated well with the retinotopic electrode layout. A third subject could not produce a coherent gaze-based phosphene map, but this may have revealed that their phosphenes were indistinct spatially. Translational Relevance: Gaze-based phosphene mapping is a viable alternative to conventional finger-based mapping, but may not be suitable for all subjects.

Indexed as

Eye MovementsVisual ProsthesisHumansPhosphenesRetinaVision Disorders

Identifiers

PMID36943168
PMCPMC10043502
OpenAlexW4328048650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.