ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2023
Development of the Engage with Impact Toolkit: A comprehensive resource to support the evaluation of patient, family and caregiver engagement in health systems.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of the methodology of independent Community Advisory Boards in health products research and development: a mixed-methods cross-sectional survey study.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Promoting the Implementation of Co-Produced Cochrane Evidence: An Exploratory Study of Improving Partnering With Consumers.Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods · 2026Article
- Conceptualizing culture change as an impact metric. A scoping review and abductive thematic analysis of culture-related outcomes from patient and public involvement in healthcare and health research.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Review
- Article
- Developing an evaluation tool for the impact of consumer partnerships in healthcare governance: a coproduced mixed methods study.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
- Supporting the continuous development and use of a patient partnership framework in European rare disease networks (ERNs): a scoping review of frameworks in the scientific literature.Journal of community genetics · 2025Review
- An umbrella review on how digital health intervention co-design is conducted and described.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Trends in Government-Initiated Public Engagement in Canadian Health Policy From 2000 to 2021.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2024Article
- Public Engagement in Health Policy-Making for Older Adults: A Systematic Search and Scoping Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- Patient engagement in a Canadian health research funding institute: implementation and impact.BMJ open · 2024Review
- PPIE in a technical research study: Using public involvement to refine the concept and understanding and move towards a multidimensional concept of disability.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Evaluating the impact of engaging older adults and service providers as research partners in the co-design of a community mobility-promoting program: a mixed methods developmental evaluation study.Research involvement and engagement · 2023Article
- Evaluating the impacts of patient engagement on a national health research network: results of a case study of the Chronic Pain Network.Research involvement and engagement · 2023Article
- Development of the Engage with Impact Toolkit: A comprehensive resource to support the evaluation of patient, family and caregiver engagement in health systems.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Article
- A holistic approach to integrating patient, family, and lived experience voices in the development of the BrainHealth Databank: a digital learning health system to enable artificial intelligence in the clinic.Frontiers in health services · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRecent shifts in the patient, family and caregiver engagement field have focused greater attention on measurement and evaluation, including the impacts of engagement efforts. Current evaluation tools offer limited support to organizations seeking to reorient their efforts in this way. We addressed this gap through the development of an impact measurement framework and accompanying evaluation toolkit-the Engage with Impact Toolkit.
methodsThe measurement framework and toolkit were co-designed with the Evaluating Patient Engagement Working Group, a multidisciplinary group of patient, family and caregiver partners, engagement specialists, researchers and government personnel. Project activities occurred over four phases: (1) project scoping and literature review; (2) modified concept mapping; (3) working group deliberations and (4) toolkit web design.
resultsThe project scope was to develop a measurement framework and an evaluation toolkit for patient engagement in health systems that were practical, accessible, menu-driven and aligned with current system priorities. Concept mapping yielded 237 impact statements that were sorted, discussed and combined into 81 unique items. A shorter list of 50 items (rated 8.0 or higher out of 10) was further consolidated to generate a final list of 35 items mapped across 8 conceptual domains of impact: (1) knowledge and skills; (2) confidence and trust; (3) equity and inclusivity; (4) priorities and decisions; (5) effectiveness and efficiency; (6) patient-centredness; (7) culture change and (8) patient outcomes and experience. Working Group members rated the final list for importance (1-5) and identified a core set of 33 items (one for each of the 8 domains and 25 supplementary items). Two domains (priorities and decisions; and culture change) yielded the highest overall importance ratings (4.8). A web-based toolkit (www.evaluateengagement.ca) hosts the measurement framework and related evaluation supports.
conclusionThe Engage with Impact Toolkit builds on existing engagement evaluation tools but brings a more explicit focus to supporting organizations to assess the impacts of their engagement work. PATIENT CONTRIBUTION: Patient, family and caregiver partners led the early conceptualization of this work and were involved at all stages and in all aspects of the work. As end-users of the toolkit, their perspectives, knowledge and opinions were critical.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.