ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2023
Convolution Neural Network Algorithm for Shockable Arrhythmia Classification Within a Digitally Connected Automated External Defibrillator.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03662802 (Development of a Novel Convolution Neural Network for Arrhythmia Classification for Shockable Cardiac Rhythms), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Development of a Novel Convolution Neural Network for Arrhythmia Classification for Shockable Cardiac Rhythms
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cascade Skip-Connection BiLSTM Autoencoder for CPR Artifact Removal Prior to AED Shock Advisory.IEEE open journal of the Computer Society · 2026Article
- Use of artificial intelligence in the out-of-hospital care settings: a scoping review.BMJ digital health & AI · 2026Article
- Drone-delivered automated external defibrillators in prehospital emergency care: implementation evidence, bottlenecks, and conceptual integration with artificial intelligence and next-generation communications.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- An interpretable multi-scale hybrid attention network (MSHAN) for explainable ECG arrhythmia classification.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in resuscitation: a scoping review.Resuscitation plus · 2025Review
- Overcoming data scarcity in life-threatening arrhythmia detection through transfer learning.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Comparison of Neural Network Structures for Identifying Shockable Rhythm During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Prospective Human Validation of Artificial Intelligence Interventions in Cardiology: A Scoping Review.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
- Effectiveness of ultraportable automated external defibrillators: A scoping review.Resuscitation plus · 2024Article
- Motion artefact management for soft bioelectronics.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2024Article
- Non-Invasive Biosensing for Healthcare Using Artificial Intelligence: A Semi-Systematic Review.Biosensors · 2024Review
- New Innovations to Address Sudden Cardiac Arrest.US cardiology · 2024Review
- Deep Learning Strategy for Sliding ECG Analysis during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Influence of the Hands-Off Time on Accuracy.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Current and Future Use of Artificial Intelligence in Electrocardiography.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background Diagnosis of shockable rhythms leading to defibrillation remains integral to improving out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes. New machine learning techniques have emerged to diagnose arrhythmias on ECGs. In out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, an algorithm within an automated external defibrillator is the major determinant to deliver defibrillation. This study developed and validated the performance of a convolution neural network (CNN) to diagnose shockable arrhythmias within a novel, miniaturized automated external defibrillator. Methods and Results There were 26 464 single-lead ECGs that comprised the study data set. ECGs of 7-s duration were retrospectively adjudicated by 3 physician readers (N=18 total readers). After exclusions (N=1582), ECGs were divided into training (N=23 156), validation (N=721), and test data sets (N=1005). CNN performance to diagnose shockable and nonshockable rhythms was reported with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, F1, and sensitivity and specificity calculations. The duration for the CNN to output was reported with the algorithm running within the automated external defibrillator. Internal and external validation analyses included CNN performance among arrhythmias, often mistaken for shockable rhythms, and performance among ECGs modified with noise to mimic artifacts. The CNN algorithm achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.995 (95% CI, 0.990-1.0), sensitivity of 98%, and specificity of 100% to diagnose shockable rhythms. The F1 scores were 0.990 and 0.995 for shockable and nonshockable rhythms, respectively. After input of a 7-s ECG, the CNN generated an output in 383±29 ms (total time of 7.383 s). The CNN outperformed adjudicators in classifying atrial arrhythmias as nonshockable (specificity of 99.3%-98.1%) and was robust against noise artifacts (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve range, 0.871-0.999). Conclusions We demonstrate high diagnostic performance of a CNN algorithm for shockable and nonshockable rhythm arrhythmia classifications within a digitally connected automated external defibrillator. Registration URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03662802; Unique identifier: NCT03662802.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.