Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36942427›Full record

ArticleProgress in transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.)2023

Testing the Differential Access Hypothesis That Black Kidney Transplant Candidates Perceive Social Network Access to Fewer Potential Living Donors Than White Candidates.

Jonathan Daw, Mary Roberts, Avrum Gillespie, Ashton M Verdery, Tanjala S Purnell

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Progress in transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan DawDepartment of Sociology and Criminology and Population Research Institute, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3364-4518
Mary RobertsDepartment of Sociology and Criminology and Population Research Institute, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Avrum GillespieSection of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Kidney Transplantation, Department of Medicine, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ashton M VerderyDepartment of Sociology and Criminology and Population Research Institute, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Tanjala S PurnellDepartment of Epidemiology and Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Pennsylvania State University · USJohns Hopkins University · USTemple University · US

Funding

The Population Research Institute: Development CoreP2CHD041025 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI Sarah Damaske · 2016 to 2026
$9.0M
Social Network Interventions to Reduce Race Disparities in Living Kidney DonationR01DK114888 · NIDDK · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI DAW, JONATHAN KYLE · 2017 to 2021
$1.2M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041025NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK114888
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMany studies of Black-White disparities in living donor kidney transplantation hypothesize that they were partially due to Black-White differences in candidate social network access to healthy, willing donors. This differential access hypothesis has not been tested using directly measured social network data. RESEARCH QUESTIONS: Do black kidney transplant candidates have perceived lower social network access to health and/or willing living donors than white candidates?

designA cross-sectional survey that measured the social network members was collected in 2015. Black-White differences in patient counts of perceived healthy and/or willing potential donors in social networks, and individual network members' probability of being perceived healthy and/or willing, were compared using logistic and negative binomial regression models.

resultsThe survey included 66 kidney transplant candidates reporting on 1474 social network members at a large Southeastern US transplant center in 2015. Black and White patients had similar access to perceived healthy, likely potential donors (86% vs 87% had 1 or more,

conclusionBlack and White transplant candidates perceived access to similar numbers of potential donors in their social networks. This result does not support the differential access hypothesis.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationLiving DonorsBlack or African AmericanCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSocial SupportUnited StatesWhiteclinical outcomesdescriptivedescriptive comparativedonor familyeducationliving donorprocurementquantitative methodsregressionresearchstatistics

Identifiers

PMID36942427
PMCPMC10150261
OpenAlexW4328048619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.