ReviewHeliyon2023
Evaluation of efficacy of non-resorbable membranes compared to resorbable membranes in patients undergoing guided bone regeneration.
Review in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Bone Ring Grafts Versus Non-Resorbable Membrane GBR for Vertical Ridge Augmentation: A Prospective Cohort Study.Oral health & preventive dentistry · 2026Article
- The potential of eggshell membrane in bone regeneration: a scoping review of applications and advances.The Saudi dental journal · 2026Review
- Comparative Evaluation of Augmentation Stability of L-Shaped Collagenated Soft Block Bone with Physically Crosslinked and Non-Crosslinked Collagen Membranes: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Socket Preservation Technique Using Allogeneic and Xenogeneic Materials: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Review
- Dental implant placement with simultaneous localized ridge augmentation using L-shaped titanium mesh in the esthetic zone: a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2024Article
- Recent Advances in Scaffolds for Guided Bone Regeneration.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Assessment of Postoperative Edema in Different Bone Graft Cases in Vertical Defects in Periodontal Surgery: An Original Research.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024Article
- Guided Bone Regeneration in the Posterior Mandible Using a Resorbable Metal Magnesium Membrane and Fixation Screws: A Case Report.Case reports in dentistry · 2024Article
- A novel functionally graded bilayer membrane with excellent barrier function andFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Resorbable GBR Scaffolds in Oral and Maxillofacial Tissue Engineering: Design, Fabrication, and Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Replacement of missing teeth in patients with prolonged edentulism poses a challenge for clinicians. An extended period of edentulism results in severe atrophy of alveolar ridges rendering them unsatisfactory for rehabilitation using an implant-supported prosthesis. To overcome this difficulty, Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) was introduced and constructed upon the principles of Guided Tissue Regeneration (GTR) procedures. Evidence suggests that GBR has proven to be a predictable treatment modality for treating vertical and horizontal ridge deficiencies. Objective: The present systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of non-resorbable ( Methods: An electronic search of three databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, was conducted for articles published until March 2022. A supplementary manual search of references from these articles was performed to include any articles that may have been overlooked in the electronic search. Articles that evaluated the efficacy of RES membranes and Results: One hundred and fifty one articles were identified in an electronic search. Eight articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the present systematic review. The studies were conducted on partially or completely edentulous patients with alveolar ridge deficiencies undergoing vertical or horizontal bone for subsequent implant placement. The majority of the studies reported similar results for bone gain in both RES and Conclusion: The available evidence suggests that RES and Clinical implications: Further research focusing on human clinical trials with well-matched subjects with homogeneity in the type and method of GBR and method of assessment of new bone formation will derive conclusive results on the efficacy of RES and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.