ArticleCureus2023
Ingested Chicken Bone (Xiphoid Process) in the Anal Canal: A Case Report and Literature Review.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Rectal abscess secondary to foreign body insertion: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accidental foreign body (FB) ingestion is common in the elderly, particularly edentulous and denture wearers. The most commonly ingested FBs are food-related, including fish and chicken bones. While small FBs can pass through the gastrointestinal tract without any complications, large or irregular-shaped FBs usually cause complications. These complications include choking, ulceration, perforation, fistula, abscess formation, or even death. Ingestion of a large chicken bone that reaches the anal canal without causing injury is extremely rare. We present a rare case of accidental chicken bone (xiphoid process) ingestion that manifested itself by projecting from the anus while defecating. Interestingly, the patient did not experience any food choking or abdominal pain, nor did she have any type of dementia. However, the patient could not grind food properly due to the loss of her upper molar teeth, which made her develop a habit of rapid swallowing. On examination, the chicken bone was seen within the anus with a sharp edge embedded in the mucosal wall. While a plain pelvic X-ray failed to display the FB, a pelvic CT scan with a 3D illustration showed its dimensions (5.0 x 2.5 x 3 cm). A plain pelvic CT scan confirmed the presence of the bone-contrast FB within the anal canal without injuring the surrounding anatomical structures. The FB was gently manipulated and successfully extracted after administering 5 ml of lidocaine gel enema. The patient was counseled regarding proper chewing habits, and she was referred to a dental clinic for a professional assessment. Seven days later, the patient was seen again at the clinic for a follow-up and was found to have an uneventful recovery. Maintaining good dental health and proper eating habits, as well as increasing awareness among edentulous individuals and denture wearers, are required to prevent accidental FB ingestions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.