ArticleAJPM focus2022
Evaluation of a Contact Tracing Training Program and Field Experience.
Article in AJPM focus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pandemic ready or playing catch-up? A scoping review of public health training programs for pandemic preparedness and response efforts.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Development of a University-Government Partnership for Public Health Response and Workforce Development in the State of Oregon.Journal of community health · 2024Article
- Rapid and sustained contact tracing training for COVID-19 in San Francisco: a training model for developing an emergency public health workforce.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The study objective was to evaluate a contact tracing training program and the role of contact tracing on volunteers' professional development. Methods: A COVID-19 contact tracing program was conducted at an urban academic medical center, in collaboration with the local health department, between March 2020 and May 2021. Contact tracers, most of whom were health professions students, completed pretraining and post-training surveys to assess knowledge and self-efficacy to conduct contact tracing, plus an 18-month follow-up survey regarding career impacts. Results: We observed statistically significant post-training increases in knowledge and self-efficacy to conduct contact tracing. Contact tracers described benefiting from training regarding cultural humility, empathy, and trauma-informed interviewing. They also expressed a deeper understanding of COVID-19 inequities and their structural causes and reported that the work was emotionally demanding. Conclusions: Key to pandemic preparedness is having a trained and supported workforce. This study showed how contact tracing training and field experience strengthened students' education in the health professions by sharpening interpersonal skills and structural competency and by generating insights regarding current gaps in both public health infrastructure and support for vulnerable populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.