ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2023
A web application to support the coordination of reflexive, interpretative toxicology testing.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Implementation of an AI System for Generating Clinical Urine Drug Test Sign-Outs.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Reflexive laboratory testing workflows can improve the assessment of patients receiving pain medications chronically, but complex workflows requiring pathologist input and interpretation may not be well-supported by traditional laboratory information systems. In this work, we describe the development of a web application that improves the efficiency of pathologists and laboratory staff in delivering actionable toxicology results. Method: Before designing the application, we set out to understand the entire workflow including the laboratory workflow and pathologist review. Additionally, we gathered requirements and specifications from stakeholders. Finally, to assess the performance of the implementation of the application, we surveyed stakeholders and documented the approximate amount of time that is required in each step of the workflow. Results: A web-based application was chosen for the ease of access for users. Relevant clinical data was routinely received and displayed in the application. The workflows in the laboratory and during the interpretation process served as the basis of the user interface. With the addition of auto-filing software, the return on investment was significant. The laboratory saved the equivalent of one full-time employee in time by automating file management and result entry. Discussion: Implementation of a purpose-built application to support reflex and interpretation workflows in a clinical pathology practice has led to a significant improvement in laboratory efficiency. Custom- and purpose-built applications can help reduce staff burnout, reduce transcription errors, and allow staff to focus on more critical issues around quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.