Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36941896›Full record

ArticleSSM - population health2023

How have firearm laws changed in states with unexpected decreases or increases in firearm homicide, 1990-2019?

Michelle Degli Esposti, Jason Goldstick, Jason Gravel, Elinore J Kaufman, M Kit Delgado, Therese S Richmond, Douglas J Wiebe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SSM - population health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. State expansion of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program eligibility and rates of firearm-involved deaths in the United States.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michelle Degli EspostiPenn Injury Science Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Jason GoldstickInjury Prevention Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, USA.
Jason GravelDepartment of Criminal Justice, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Elinore J KaufmanPenn Injury Science Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
M Kit DelgadoPenn Injury Science Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Therese S RichmondPenn Injury Science Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Douglas J WiebePenn Injury Science Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Firearm violence is one of the leading preventable causes of death and injury in the United States and is on the rise. While policies regulating access to firearms offer opportunities to prevent firearm-related deaths, an understanding of the holistic impact of changing state firearm policies on firearm homicide rates over the last 30 years is limited. Objectives: To identify US states that showed unexpected decreases and increases in firearm homicide rates and summarise their firearm policy changes in the last three decades. Methods: We analysed changes in firearm homicide rates by US state and county from 1990 to 2019. We triangulated across three estimation approaches to derive state rankings and identify the top and bottom three states which consistently showed unexpected decreases (low outliers) and increases (high outliers) in firearm homicide rates. We summarised firearm policy changes in state outliers using the RAND State Firearm Law Database. Results: We identified New York, District of Columbia, and Hawaii as low state outliers and Delaware, New Jersey, and Missouri as high state outliers. Low state outliers made more restrictive firearm policy changes than high state outliers, which covered a wider range of policy types. Restrictive changes in high state outliers primarily targeted high-risk populations (e.g., prohibited possessors, safe storage). Specific legislative details, such as the age threshold (18 vs 21 years old) for firearm minimum age requirements, also emerged as important for differentiating low from high state outliers. Conclusions: While no firearm law change emerged as necessary or sufficient, an accumulation of diverse restrictive firearm policies may be key to alleviating the death toll from firearm homicide.

Indexed as

Firearm homicideFirearm policyInductive researchState outliers

Identifiers

PMID36941896
PMCPMC10024039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.