Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36941774›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational medicine2023

The future of ChatGPT in academic research and publishing: A commentary for clinical and translational medicine.

Jun Wen, Wei Wang

Full text read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. ChatGPT and Medical Research: A Meta-Synthesis of Opportunities and Challenges.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. A Bibliometric Analysis of the Rise of ChatGPT in Medical Research.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jun WenSchool of Business and Law, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia.
Wei WangCentre for Precision Health, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1430-1360

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

PublishingTranslational Science, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID36941774
PMCPMC10028016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read2
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.