Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36941726›Full record

ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2023

Chemical rules for optimization of chemical mutagenicity via matched molecular pairs analysis and machine learning methods.

Chaofeng Lou, Hongbin Yang, Hua Deng, Mengting Huang, Weihua Li, Guixia Liu, Philip W Lee, Yun Tang

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chaofeng LouShanghai Frontiers Science Center of Optogenetic Techniques for Cell Metabolism, School of Pharmacy, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200237, China.
Hongbin YangShanghai Frontiers Science Center of Optogenetic Techniques for Cell Metabolism, School of Pharmacy, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200237, China.
Hua DengShanghai Frontiers Science Center of Optogenetic Techniques for Cell Metabolism, School of Pharmacy, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200237, China.
Mengting HuangShanghai Frontiers Science Center of Optogenetic Techniques for Cell Metabolism, School of Pharmacy, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200237, China.
Weihua LiShanghai Frontiers Science Center of Optogenetic Techniques for Cell Metabolism, School of Pharmacy, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200237, China.
Guixia LiuShanghai Frontiers Science Center of Optogenetic Techniques for Cell Metabolism, School of Pharmacy, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200237, China.
Philip W LeeShanghai Frontiers Science Center of Optogenetic Techniques for Cell Metabolism, School of Pharmacy, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200237, China.
Yun TangShanghai Frontiers Science Center of Optogenetic Techniques for Cell Metabolism, School of Pharmacy, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200237, China. ytang234@ecust.edu.cn.

Funding

111 Project Grant BP0719034National Key Research and Development Program of China Grant 2019YFA0904800National Natural Science Foundation of China 82173746National Natural Science Foundation of China Grants 81872800
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemical mutagenicity is a serious issue that needs to be addressed in early drug discovery. Over a long period of time, medicinal chemists have manually summarized a series of empirical rules for the optimization of chemical mutagenicity. However, given the rising amount of data, it is getting more difficult for medicinal chemists to identify more comprehensive chemical rules behind the biochemical data. Herein, we integrated a large Ames mutagenicity data set with 8576 compounds to derive mutagenicity transformation rules for reversing Ames mutagenicity via matched molecular pairs analysis. A well-trained consensus model with a reasonable applicability domain was constructed, which showed favorable performance in the external validation set with an accuracy of 0.815. The model was used to assess the generalizability and validity of these mutagenicity transformation rules. The results demonstrated that these rules were of great value and could provide inspiration for the structural modifications of compounds with potential mutagenic effects. We also found that the local chemical environment of the attachment points of rules was critical for successful transformation. To facilitate the use of these mutagenicity transformation rules, we integrated them into ADMETopt2 ( http://lmmd.ecust.edu.cn/admetsar2/admetopt2/ ), a free web server for optimization of chemical ADMET properties. The above-mentioned approach would be extended to the optimization of other toxicity endpoints.

Indexed as

Consensus modelLead optimizationMachine learningMatched molecular pairs analysisMutagenicity optimization

Identifiers

PMID36941726
PMCPMC10029263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read49
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.