Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36941722›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2023

Setting and Monitoring of Mechanical Ventilation During Venovenous ECMO.

Benjamin Assouline, Alain Combes, Matthieu Schmidt

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. ECMO-weaning facilitated by neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA): a case for principal clarification.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Benjamin AssoulineMédecine Intensive Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Alain CombesMédecine Intensive Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France. alain.combes@aphp.fr.
Matthieu SchmidtSorbonne Université, GRC 30, RESPIRE, UMRS 1166, ICAN Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article is one of ten reviews selected from the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2023. Other selected articles can be found online at  https://www.biomedcentral.com/collections/annualupdate2023 . Further information about the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine is available from  https://link.springer.com/bookseries/8901 .

Indexed as

Emergency MedicineExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationCritical CareHumansIntensive Care UnitsRespiration, Artificial

Identifiers

PMID36941722
PMCPMC10027594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read28
identifiers read2
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.