ReviewCritical care (London, England)2023
Interrogating the sepsis host immune response using cytomics.
Review in Critical care (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Aberrant STAT signaling and T cell dysregulation define a targetable pediatric sepsis endotype.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Article
- Mass cytometry reveals complex neutrophil heterogeneity in patients with severe sepsis.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026Article
- Whole transcriptome analysis reveals T cell signaling activation in septic patients with thrombocytopenia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Unpacking the sepsis controversy.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2025Review
- Roles of cytokine storm in sepsis progression: biomarkers, and emerging therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- The Omics Complexity in Sepsis: The Limits of the Personalized Medicine Approach.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Basophils absence predicts poor prognosis and indicates immunosuppression of patients in intensive care units.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article is one of ten reviews selected from the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2023. Other selected articles can be found online at https://www.biomedcentral.com/collections/annualupdate2023 . Further information about the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine is available from https://link.springer.com/bookseries/8901 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.