Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36941642›Full record

ArticleJournal of foot and ankle research2023

Plantar pressure and falling risk in older individuals: a cross-sectional study.

Yifeng Yan, Jianlin Ou, Hanxue Shi, Chenming Sun, Longbin Shen, Zhen Song, Lin Shu, Zhuoming Chen

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yifeng Yan *Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Jianlin Ou *Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Hanxue ShiSchool of Future Technology, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Chenming SunDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Longbin ShenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhen SongSchool of Future Technology, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Lin ShuSchool of Future Technology, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China. shul@scut.edu.cn.
Zhuoming ChenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China. zm120tchzm@qq.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9759-7015
First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University · CNSouth China University of Technology · CN

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China 2020YFC2005700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFalls are commonplace among elderly people. It is urgent to prevent falls. Previous studies have confirmed that there is a difference in plantar pressure between falls and non-falls in elderly people, but the relationship between fall risk and foot pressure has not been studied. In this study, the differences in dynamic plantar pressure between elderly people with high and low fall risk were preliminarily discussed, and the characteristic parameters of plantar pressure were determined.

methodsTwenty four high-fall-risk elderly individuals (HR) and 24 low-fall-risk elderly individuals (LR) were selected using the Berg Balance Scale 40 score. They wore wearable foot pressure devices to walk along a 20-m-long corridor. The peak pressure (PP), pressure time integral (PTI), pressure gradient (maximum pressure gradient (MaxPG), minimum pressure gradient (MinPG), full width at half maximum (FWHM)) and average pressure (AP) of their feet were measured for inter-group and intra-group analysis.

resultsThe foot pressure difference comparing the high fall risk with low fall risk groups was manifested in PP and MaxPG, concentrated in the midfoot and heel (p < 0.05), while the only time parameter, FWHM, was manifested in the whole foot (p < 0.05). The differences between the left and right foot were reflected in all parameters. The differences between the left and right foot in LR were mainly reflected in the heel (p < 0.05), while it in the HR was mainly reflected in the forefoot (p < 0.05).

conclusionsThe differences comparing the high fall risk with low fall risk groups were mostly reflected in the midfoot and heel. The HR may have been more cautious when landing. In the intra-group comparison, the difference between the right and left foot of the LR was mainly reflected during heel striking, while it was mainly reflected during pedalling in the HR. The sensitivity of PP, PTI and AP was lower and the newly introduced pressure gradient could better reflect the difference in foot pressure between the two groups. The pressure gradient can be used as a new foot pressure parameter in scientific research.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsFootAgedCross-Sectional StudiesHeelHumansPressureElderly peopleFall riskPlantar pressure

Identifiers

PMID36941642
PMCPMC10029259
OpenAlexW4328048362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read2
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.