ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2023
Estimation of the proper gap ratio using preoperative radiography for posterior tibial slope maintenance in biplanar open wedge high tibial osteotomy.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of a patient-specific instrument and conventional high tibial Osteotomy: Accuracy of correction target and prevention of posterior tibial slope change.Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology · 2025Article
- Optimal Plate Position for Biomechanical Stability in Medial Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: A Finite Element Analysis.Clinics in orthopedic surgery · 2025Article
- Factors influencing the posterior tibial slope after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Fixation stability and stress redistribution following metal block use in opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a finite element analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to estimate the ratio of the anterior and posterior gaps before surgery that can minimize the posterior tibial slope (PTS) change through preoperative radiography, and to confirm whether the use of the block helps maintain the PTS during open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO).
methodsPatients who underwent OWHTO between 2015 and 2018 were included. To measure optimal anterior gap (AG) and posterior gap (PG) ratio, hinge to medial tibial tuberosity length (HTL), total osteotomy length (TOL), and PTS were measured using knee AP X-ray. Real AG and PG were measured using postoperative knee computed tomography. Use of the block was also confirmed.
resultsTotal 107 knees (95 patients) were included. The average ratio between HTL and TOL was 70.9%. The average ratio AG: PG was 72.9%. PTS increased significantly from 10.2° to 11.2° postoperatively (p = 0.006). When the difference in HTL: TOL and AG: PG, and the amount of PTS change were analyzed using linear regression, there was a statistically significant correlation (correlation coefficient: - 25.9; p < 0.001). There was no difference in AG: PG according to the use of the block (p = 0.882).
conclusionIn OWHTO, PTS change can be minimized by estimating the ratio of the AG and PG using radiographs, and is was approximately 70%. If the ratio is increased by 10% from the predicted value, the PTS increases by approximately 2.6°. Using a block during OWHTO did not have a considerable advantage in terms of PTS maintenance compared to the group not using a block. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.