Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36941575›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2023

ctDNA guided adjuvant chemotherapy versus standard of care adjuvant chemotherapy after curative surgery in patients with high risk stage II or stage III colorectal cancer: a multi-centre, prospective, randomised control trial (TRACC Part C).

Susanna Slater, Annette Bryant, Hsiang-Chi Chen, Ruwaida Begum, Isma Rana, Maria Aresu, Clare Peckitt, Oleg Zhitkov, Retchel Lazaro-Alcausi, Victoria Borja and 8 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldFull text readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04050345 (Tracking Mutations in Cell Free Tumour DNA to Predict Relapse in Early Colorectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04050345 recruitingnot on this map

Tracking Mutations in Cell Free Tumour DNA to Predict Relapse in Early Colorectal Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustRan2016 to 2031Enrolled1,000ConditionsColorectal Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Adjuvant treatment intensity in circulating tumour DNA-negative colorectal cancer: a systematic review and reconstructed individual patient data meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Susanna SlaterRoyal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Annette BryantRoyal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Hsiang-Chi ChenRoyal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Ruwaida BegumRoyal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Isma RanaRoyal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Maria AresuRoyal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Clare PeckittRoyal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Oleg ZhitkovRoyal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Retchel Lazaro-AlcausiRoyal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Victoria BorjaRoyal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Rachel PowellRoyal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
David LoweryBiomedical Research Centre at the Royal Marsden and the Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Michael HubankCentre for Molecular Pathology at the The Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.
Thereasa RichGuardant Health, INC, Redwood City, CA, USA.
Gayathri AnandappaRoyal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Ian ChauRoyal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Naureen Starling *Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
David Cunningham *Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. david.cunningham@rmh.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3234-6327
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GBGuardant (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCirculating tumour DNA (ctDNA) to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) is emerging as a biomarker to predict recurrence in patients with curatively treated early stage colorectal cancer (CRC). ctDNA risk stratifies patients to guide adjuvant treatment decisions. We are conducting the UK's first multi-centre, prospective, randomised study to determine whether a de-escalation strategy using ctDNA to guide adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) decisions is non-inferior to standard of care (SOC) chemotherapy, as measured by 3-year disease free survival (DFS) in patients with resected CRC with no evidence of MRD (ctDNA negative post-operatively). In doing so we may be able to spare patients unnecessary chemotherapy and associated toxicity and achieve significant cost savings for the National Health Service (NHS).

methodsWe are recruiting patients with fully resected high risk stage II and stage III CRC who are being considered for ACT into the study which uses results from a plasma-only ctDNA assay to guide treatment decisions. Eligible patients are randomised 1:1 to receive ctDNA-guided chemotherapy versus SOC chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is the difference in DFS at 3 years between the trial arms. Secondary endpoints include the proportion of patients in the ctDNA-guided arm who are ctDNA negative post-operatively and receive de-escalated ACT compared to the standard arm, the difference in overall survival (OS), neurotoxicity and quality of life between the arms, and the cost-effectiveness of ctDNA-guided therapy compared to SOC treatment. We hypothesise that using a ctDNA-guided approach to ACT decisions is non-inferior to SOC. Target accrual is 1621 patients over 4 years, which will provide a power of 80% with an alpha of 0.1 to demonstrate non-inferiority with a margin of 1.25 in survival of the ctDNA-guided approach compared to SOC. We anticipate approximately 50 UK centres will participate. The study opened with the Guardant Reveal plasma-only ctDNA assay in August 2022. DISCUSSION: The trial will determine whether ctDNA guided ACT is non-inferior to SOC ACT in patients with fully resected high risk stage II and stage III resected CRC, with the potential to significantly reduce unnecessary ACT and the toxicity associated with it.

trial registrationNCT04050345.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsState MedicineChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalHumansProspective StudiesQuality of LifeStandard of CareAdjuvant chemotherapyColorectal cancerctDNADisease free survivalRandomised

Identifiers

PMID36941575
PMCPMC10026439
OpenAlexW4327972762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read22
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.