Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36941552›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2023

How European Fans in Training (EuroFIT), a lifestyle change program for men delivered in football clubs, achieved its effect: a mixed methods process evaluation embedded in a randomised controlled trial.

Christopher Bunn, Victoria Palmer, Nai Rui Chng, Eivind Andersen, Cindy M Gray, Kate Hunt, Judith G M Jelsma, Heather Morgan, Maria Nijhuis-van der Sanden, Hugo V Pereira and 13 more

Full text readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Christopher BunnSchool of Health and Wellbeing, College of Social Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. christopher.bunn@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6604-1305
Victoria PalmerSchool of Health and Wellbeing, College of Social Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Nai Rui ChngSchool of Health and Wellbeing, College of Social Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Eivind AndersenInstitute for Sport and Social Science, Norwegian School of Sport Science, Oslo, Norway.
Cindy M GraySchool of Health and Wellbeing, College of Social Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Kate HuntSchool of Health and Wellbeing, College of Social Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Judith G M JelsmaAmsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Health Behaviors & Chronic Diseases, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Heather MorganInstitute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK.
Maria Nijhuis-van der SandenRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, IQ Healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Hugo V PereiraCIDEFES - Centro de Investigação em Desporto, Faculdade de Educação Física e Desporto da Universidade Lusófona, Educação Física, Exercício e Saúde, Lisbon, Portugal.
Matthew PhilpottEuropean Healthy Stadia Network CIC Ltd, Liverpool, UK.
Glyn C RobertsInstitute for Sport and Social Science, Norwegian School of Sport Science, Oslo, Norway.
John RooksbyComputer and Information Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Øystein B RøynesdalInstitute for Sport and Social Science, Norwegian School of Sport Science, Oslo, Norway.
Marlene N SilvaCIDEFES - Centro de Investigação em Desporto, Faculdade de Educação Física e Desporto da Universidade Lusófona, Educação Física, Exercício e Saúde, Lisbon, Portugal.
Marit SørensenInstitute for Sport and Social Science, Norwegian School of Sport Science, Oslo, Norway.
Pedro J TeixeiraCIDEFES - Centro de Investigação em Desporto, Faculdade de Educação Física e Desporto da Universidade Lusófona, Educação Física, Exercício e Saúde, Lisbon, Portugal.
Theo van AchterbergDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Louvain, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Louvain, Belgium.
Irene van de GlindFWG, Department of Researchesearch and Development, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Willem van MechelenAmsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Health Behaviors & Chronic Diseases, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Femke van NassauAmsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Health Behaviors & Chronic Diseases, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hidde P van der PloegAmsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Health Behaviors & Chronic Diseases, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sally WykeSchool of Health and Wellbeing, College of Social Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA randomised trial of European Fans in Training (EuroFIT), a 12-week healthy lifestyle program delivered in 15 professional football clubs in the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, and the United Kingdom, successfully increased physical activity and improved diet but did not reduce sedentary time. To guide future implementation, this paper investigates how those effects were achieved. We ask: 1) how was EuroFIT implemented? 2) what were the processes through which outcomes were achieved?

methodsWe analysed qualitative data implementation notes, observations of 29 of 180 weekly EuroFIT deliveries, semi-structured interviews with 16 coaches and 15 club representatives, and 30 focus group discussions with participants (15 post-program and 15 after 12 months). We descriptively analysed quantitative data on recruitment, attendance at sessions and logs of use of the technologies and survey data on the views of participants at baseline, post program and after 12 months. We used a triangulation protocol to investigate agreement between data from difference sources, organised around meeting 15 objectives within the two research questions.

resultsWe successfully recruited clubs, coaches and men to EuroFIT though the draw of the football club seemed stronger in the UK and Portugal. Advertising that emphasized getting fitter, club-based deliveries, and not 'standing out' worked and attendance and fidelity were good, so that coaches in all countries were able to deliver EuroFIT flexibly as intended. Coaches in all 15 clubs facilitated the use of behaviour change techniques and interaction between men, which together enhanced motivation. Participants found it harder to change sedentary time than physical activity and diet. Fitting changes into daily routines, planning for setbacks and recognising the personal benefit of behaviour change were important to maintain changes. Bespoke technologies were valued, but technological hitches frustrated participants.

conclusionEuroFIT was delivered as planned by trained club coaches working flexibly in all countries. It worked as expected to attract men and support initiation and maintenance of changes in physical activity and diet but the use of bespoke, unstable, technologies was frustrating. Future deliveries should eliminate the focus on sedentary time and should use only proven technologies to support self-monitoring and social interaction.

trial registrationISRCTN81935608, registered 16/06/2015.

Indexed as

FootballSoccerExerciseHealthy LifestyleHumansMalePortugalProgram EvaluationFootballInterventionMixed MethodsPhysical ActivityProcess EvaluationSedentary Time

Identifiers

PMID36941552
PMCPMC10026416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read3
measurements read28
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.