Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36941505›Full record

Trial reportChinese journal of integrative medicine2023

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Mindfulness in Recovery from Colorectal Cancer.

Andrew McCombie, Jennifer Jordan, Roger Mulder, Kishion Dee, Ee Lin Ong, Fernanda Fernandez Zimmermann, Chris Frampton, Frank Frizelle

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Chinese journal of integrative medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Global landscape and hotspot analysis of meditation research in cancer: a bibliometric study.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrew McCombieTe Whatu Ora (Health New Zealand) Waitaha Canterbury, Christchurch, 8011, New Zealand. Andrew.mccombie@cdhb.health.nz.
Jennifer JordanTe Whatu Ora (Health New Zealand) Waitaha Canterbury, Christchurch, 8011, New Zealand.
Roger MulderTe Whatu Ora (Health New Zealand) Waitaha Canterbury, Christchurch, 8011, New Zealand.
Kishion DeeThe Psychology Hub, Christchurch, 8011, New Zealand.
Ee Lin OngOxford Mindfulness Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 2JD, UK.
Fernanda Fernandez ZimmermannUniversity of Otago, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand.
Chris FramptonUniversity of Otago, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand.
Frank FrizelleTe Whatu Ora (Health New Zealand) Waitaha Canterbury, Christchurch, 8011, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study examined whether a 4-week group-based mindfulness intervention would be superior in reducing psychological distress in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients compared to a psychoeducation and cognitive behavioural skills learning support active control group.

methodsPatients with CRC were randomized via Computerised Permuted Block Randomisation to mindfulness or active control groups (2-h weekly sessions over 4 weeks). Outcomes were measured pre-intervention, and 8 weeks and 6 months post-baseline. The primary outcome was psychological distress measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Secondary outcomes were generic quality of life (QoL), disease specific QoL, mindfulness, and intervention credibility and acceptability.

resultsSixty-eight participants were randomized to mindfulness (n=35) or active control group (n=33). Uptake of potentially eligible patients consenting was low (28.0%) and the dropout rate was 33.8%. Depression scores were reduced in both groups at week 8 (P=0.020). Control participants had greater improvement in generic mental QoL scores at week 8 than mindfulness (P=0.023). In disease specific QoL, there was reduction in impotence symptom in the mindfulness group (P=0.022) and reduction in faecal incontinence in the control group (P=0.019). The embarrassment symptom had a significantly lower increase in the mindfulness group at week 8 compared to the control group (P=0.009). Both groups rated the treatments as credible and acceptable.

conclusionsMindfulness was not superior to the active control group in terms of alleviating psychological distress but both treatments were associated with some improvements in depression. There was low uptake of both interventions. (Trial registration number: ACTRN12616001033437).

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsMindfulnessHumansMaleQuality of Lifeanxietycolorectal cancerdepressiondistressmindfulnesspsychoeducationpsychological distresspsychologyquality of liferandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID36941505
PMCPMC10027425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.