ArticleEuropean radiology2023
Facilitating combined biopsy and percutaneous microwave ablation of pulmonary ground-glass opacities using lipiodol localisation.
Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Percutaneous iodixanol localization of pulmonary ground-glass nodules for synchronous microwave ablation and biopsy: a multicenter, retrospective, matched analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Review
- Enhanced management strategy of synchronous percutaneous biopsy and microwave ablation in patients with lung ground-glass opacities undergoing antithrombotic treatment: a clinical perspective on our experience.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWhether preoperative localisation is necessary and valuable for the microwave ablation (MWA) of small pulmonary lesions with ground-glass opacity (GGO) remains unclear. This study aimed to explore the role of the Chiba needle and lipiodol localisation techniques in facilitating MWA and biopsy.
methodsThis retrospective before-after study included patients with GGOs who underwent conventional MWA and biopsy treatment in our hospital between January 2018 and December 2019 (group A) or who underwent the Chiba needle and lipiodol localisation treatment before MWA and biopsy between January 2020 and December 2020 (group B). The characteristics of each patient and GGO lesion were collected and analysed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the localisation technique.
resultsA total of 122 patients with 152 GGOs and 131 patients with 156 GGOs underwent MWA and biopsy in groups A and B, respectively. The primary technique efficacy rate of MWA differed significantly between the two groups (A vs. B: 94.1% vs. 99.4%; p = 0.009). The positive biopsy rate in the two groups was determined by the difference (A vs. B: 93.4% vs. 98.1%; p = 0.042). The incidence of complications did not increase in group B.
conclusionsCompared with the unmarked group, the Chiba needle and lipiodol localisation technique improved the positive rate of biopsy and the initial effective rate of MWA, without significantly increasing the complication rate. KEY POINTS: • The localisation of the Chiba needle and lipiodol could improve the positive biopsy rate and the initial effective rate of MWA. • The localisation of the Chiba needle and lipiodol does not affect the subsequent MWA and biopsy and does not increase the incidence of pneumothorax and haemorrhage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.