Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36941465›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater2023

Study protocol of an observational study in acute psychiatric home treatment: How does home treatment work? Identification of common factors and predictors of treatment success.

Felix Baumann, Vera Bergamaschi, Ingeborg Warnke, Salvatore Corbisiero, Kerstin Gabriel Felleiter, Seraina Fellmann, Fabian Ludwig, Andreas Riedel, Hansjörg Znoj, Stefanie Schmidt

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Felix BaumannInstitute of Psychology, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland. felix.baumann@lups.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3437-859X
Vera BergamaschiInstitute of Psychology, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland. vera.bergamschi@lups.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6042-7792
Ingeborg WarnkeLucerne Psychiatry, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Salvatore CorbisieroLucerne Psychiatry, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Kerstin Gabriel FelleiterLucerne Psychiatry, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Seraina FellmannLucerne Psychiatry, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Fabian LudwigLucerne Psychiatry, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Andreas Riedel
Hansjörg ZnojInstitute of Psychology, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland.
Stefanie SchmidtInstitute of Psychology, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSystematic reviews indicated that home treatment is an effective and cost-saving alternative to conventional acute psychiatric treatment options. Treatment success has often been defined as a reduction of hospital admissions. In the current study, symptoms and well-being are assessed regularly during treatment as an indicator for treatment success. Patients' characteristics such as diagnosis, age, substance use, and motivation for treatment were discussed as predictors for treatment success. A second focal point of the study lies in the examination of the therapeutic relationship in terms of the outcome, which has not yet been systematically investigated in home treatment.

methodsThis is an observational study with a prospective naturalistic design. Measurements are carried out at baseline, during and at the end of treatment as well as at the 3‑month follow-up. Patients' characteristics as potential predictors for treatment success will be assessed at baseline. In addition, the perceived relationship between the patients and the team will be measured daily and weekly throughout the treatment. Treatment success is by the changes in symptoms and general well-being assessed weekly. We aim to include 82 participants assigned to home treatment. Variance analyses with repeated measurements will be conducted to evaluate treatment success.

conclusionBy examining potential patient- and relationship-related predictors of treatment success, insights into relevant determining variables of treatment success in this setting are expected. The results might help to better identify who benefits the most from home treatment.

Indexed as

HospitalizationSubstance-Related DisordersHumansMotivationObservational Studies as TopicProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAcute psychiatryFollow-upMental health servicesSocial aspectsTherapeutic relationship

Identifiers

PMID36941465
PMCPMC10703946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.