Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36941412›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2023

Dynamic changes to signal allocation rules in response to variable social environments in house mice.

Caitlin H Miller, Matthew F Hillock, Jay Yang, Brandon Carlson-Clarke, Klaudio Haxhillari, Annie Y Lee, Melissa R Warden, Michael J Sheehan

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Caitlin H MillerDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. chm79@cornell.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3317-1821
Matthew F HillockDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8982-5364
Jay YangDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Brandon Carlson-ClarkeDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Klaudio HaxhillariDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Annie Y LeeDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Melissa R WardenDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2240-3997
Michael J SheehanDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. msheehan@cornell.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3949-7873

Funding

Imaging the Evolving Neural Circuit Dynamics of DepressionDP2MH109982 · NIMH · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI WARDEN, MELISSA RHOADS · 2015 to 2015
$2.3M
Lateral habenula circuits for the regulation of goal-directed behaviorR01MH127510 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI WARDEN, MELISSA RHOADS · 2021 to 2025
$1.9M
Neural circuit regulation of ramping activity in dopamine neuronsR01DA055075 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Melissa Rhoads Warden · 2022 to 2026
$1.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA055075NIMH NIH HHS DP2 MH109982NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH127510
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urine marking is central to mouse social behavior. Males use depletable and costly urine marks in intrasexual competition and mate attraction. We investigate how males alter signaling decisions across variable social landscapes using thermal imaging to capture spatiotemporal marking data. Thermal recording reveals fine-scale adjustments in urinary motor patterns in response to competition and social odors. Males demonstrate striking winner-loser effects in scent mark allocation effort and timing. Competitive experience primes temporal features of marking and modulates responses to scent familiarity. Males adjust signaling effort, mark latency, and marking rhythm, depending on the scent identities in the environment. Notably, recent contest outcome affects how males respond to familiar and unfamiliar urine. Winners increase marking effort toward unfamiliar relative to familiar male scents, whereas losers reduce marking effort to unfamiliar but increase to familiar rival scents. All males adjust their scent mark timing after a contest regardless of fight outcome, and deposit marks in more rapid bursts during marking bouts. In contrast to this dynamism, initial signal investment predicts aspects of scent marking days later, revealing the possibility of alternative marking strategies among competitive males. These data show that mice flexibly update their signaling decisions in response to changing social landscapes.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalSocial BehaviorAnimalsMaleMiceOdorantsPheromonesSocial EnvironmentPheromones

Identifiers

PMID36941412
PMCPMC10027867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read64
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.