ArticleScientific reports2023
Muscle prestimulation tunes velocity preflex in simulated perturbed hopping.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Muscle-tendon mechanics resolve the trade-off between energy-efficient and robust locomotion.Biology letters · 2025Article
- Muscle preflex response to perturbations in locomotion:Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Muscle fibres possess unique visco-elastic properties, which generate a stabilising zero-delay response to unexpected perturbations. This instantaneous response-termed "preflex"-mitigates neuro-transmission delays, which are hazardous during fast locomotion due to the short stance duration. While the elastic contribution to preflexes has been studied extensively, the function of fibre viscosity due to the force-velocity relation remains unknown. In this study, we present a novel approach to isolate and quantify the preflex force produced by the force-velocity relation in musculo-skeletal computer simulations. We used our approach to analyse the muscle response to ground-level perturbations in simulated vertical hopping. Our analysis focused on the preflex-phase-the first 30 ms after impact-where neuronal delays render a controlled response impossible. We found that muscle force at impact and dissipated energy increase with perturbation height, helping reject the perturbations. However, the muscle fibres reject only 15% of step-down perturbation energy with constant stimulation. An open-loop rising stimulation, observed in locomotion experiments, amplified the regulatory effects of the muscle fibre's force-velocity relation, resulting in 68% perturbation energy rejection. We conclude that open-loop neuronal tuning of muscle activity around impact allows for adequate feed-forward tuning of muscle fibre viscous capacity, facilitating energy adjustment to unexpected ground-level perturbations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.