ArticleScientific reports2023
Application of quantitative T1, T2 and T2* mapping magnetic resonance imaging in cartilage degeneration of the shoulder joint.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06707948 (Comparison of Different Treatment Strategies for Root Injury Behind the Medial Meniscus to Delay the Progression of Knee Osteoarthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Different Treatment Strategies for Root Injury Behind the Medial Meniscus to Delay the Progression of Knee Osteoarthritis: a Prospective Cohort Study
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preoperative prediction of meningioma grade based on synthetic MRI quantitative T1 and T2 mapping.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Synthetic T2-weighted images and T2 quantification using GRAPPATINI for shoulder joint evaluation: comparison with conventional T2-weighted images.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers of PRP-Induced Tendon Remodelling in Chronic Tendinopathy: Review and Single-Centre Experience with Ultrasound Radiomics and MRI T2 Profiling.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Stem Cell and Cell-Free Strategies for Osteoarthritis: Toward Durable Regenerative Therapies.Stem cells international · 2026Review
- Knee Cartilage Quantification: Performance of Low-Field MR in Detecting Low Grades of Chondropathy.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Comparison of test-retest repeatability of DESPOT and 3D-QALAS for TQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Multiscale correlations between joint and tissue-specific biomechanics and anatomy in postmortem ovine stifles.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Patellar Non-Traumatic Pathologies: A Pictorial Review of Radiologic Findings.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The clinical application value of 3.0T magnetic resonance T2 mapping imaging in evaluating the degree of acetabular cartilage degeneration in joint replacement surgery running title: MRI and acetabular cartilage degeneration.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- Comparison of MRI and arthroscopy findings for transitional zone cartilage damage in the acetabulum of the hip joint.Skeletal radiology · 2024Article
- Insights into the Age Dependency of Compositional MR Biomarkers Quantifying the Health Status of Cartilage in Metacarpophalangeal Joints.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Glenohumeral cartilage lesions: reviewing diagnostic imaging strategies and preoperative evaluation.Radiologia brasileiraReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate and compare the values of 3.0 T MRI T1, T2 and T2* mapping quantification techniques in evaluating cartilage degeneration of the shoulder joint. This study included 123 shoulder joints of 119 patients, which were scanned in 3.0 T MRI with axial Fat Suppression Proton Density Weighted Image (FS-PDWI), sagittal fat suppression T2 Weighted Image (FS-T2WI), coronal T1Weighted Image (T1WI), FS-PDWI, cartilage-specific T1, T2 and T2* mapping sequences. Basing on MRI images, the shoulder cartilage was classified into grades 0 1, 2, 3 and 4 according to the International Cartilage Regeneration & Joint Preservation Society (ICRS). The grading of shoulder cartilage was based on MRI images with ICRS as reference, and did not involve arthroscopy or histology.The T1, T2 and T2* relaxation values in the superior, middle and inferior bands of shoulder articular cartilage were measured at all grades, and the differences in various indicators between groups were analyzed and compared using a single-factor ANOVA test. The correlation between T1, T2 and T2* relaxation values and MRI-based grading was analyzed by SPSS software. There were 46 shoulder joints with MRI-based grade 0 in healthy control group (n = 46), while 49 and 28 shoulder joints with grade 1-2 (mild degeneration subgroup) and grade 3-4 (severe degeneration subgroup) in patient group (n = 73), accounting for 63.6% and 36.4%, respectively. The T1, T2 and T2* relaxation values of the superior, middle and inferior bands of shoulder articular cartilage were significantly and positively correlated with the MRI-based grading (P < 0.01). MRI-basedgrading of shoulder cartilage was markedly associated with age (r = 0.766, P < 0.01). With the aggravation of cartilage degeneration, T1, T2 and T2* relaxation values showed an upward trend (all P < 0.01), and T1, T2 and T2* mapping could distinguish cartilage degeneration at all levels (all P < 0.01). The T1, T2 and T2* relaxation values were significantly different between normal group and mild degeneration subgroup, normal group and severe degeneration subgroup, mild degeneration subgroup and severe degeneration subgroup (all P < 0.05). Quantitative T1, T2 and T2* mapping can quantify the degree of shoulder cartilage degeneration. All these MRI mapping quantification techniques can be used as critical supplementary sequences to assess shoulder cartilage degeneration, among which T2 mapping has the highest value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.