Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36941263›Full record

ArticleNPJ microgravity2023

Meta-analysis of the space flight and microgravity response of the Arabidopsis plant transcriptome.

Richard Barker, Colin P S Kruse, Christina Johnson, Amanda Saravia-Butler, Homer Fogle, Hyun-Seok Chang, Ralph Møller Trane, Noah Kinscherf, Alicia Villacampa, Aránzazu Manzano and 10 more

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ microgravity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Biofilms: from the cradle of life to life support.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Richard BarkerDepartment of Botany, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5681-9857
Colin P S KruseLos Alamos National Laboratory, Bioscience Division, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA.
Christina JohnsonNASA John F. Kennedy Space Center, Titusville, FL, 32899, USA.
Amanda Saravia-ButlerSpace Biosciences Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, 94035, USA.
Homer FogleSpace Biosciences Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, 94035, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5579-5432
Hyun-Seok ChangDepartment of Botany, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1151-5969
Ralph Møller TraneDepartment of Statistics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
Noah KinscherfDepartment of Botany, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8807-1089
Alicia VillacampaCentro de Investigaciones Biológicas Margarita Salas (CSIC), 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Aránzazu ManzanoCentro de Investigaciones Biológicas Margarita Salas (CSIC), 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Raúl HerranzCentro de Investigaciones Biológicas Margarita Salas (CSIC), 28040, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0246-9449
Laurence B DavinInstitute of Biological Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164-741, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3248-6485
Norman G LewisInstitute of Biological Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164-741, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5742-032X
Imara PereraDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9421-1420
Chris WolvertonDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, Ohio Wesleyan University, Delaware, OH, 43015, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1177-707X
Parul GuptaDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA.
Pankaj JaiswalDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1005-8383
Sigrid S ReinschSpace Biosciences Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, 94035, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6484-7521
Sarah WyattDepartment of Environmental and Plant Biology, Ohio University, Athens, OH, 45701, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7874-0509
Simon GilroyDepartment of Botany, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53706, USA. sgilroy@wisc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9597-6839

Funding

European Space Agency (ESA) 1340112 4000131202/20/NL/PG/ptMinistry of Economy and Competitiveness | Agencia Estatal de Investigación (Spanish Agencia Estatal de Investigación) RTI2018-099309-B-I00National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 80NSSC18K0132National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 80NSSC19K0126National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 80NSSC19K1481National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 80NSSC21K0577National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) NNX15AG55GNational Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) NNX15AG56GNSF | BIO | Division of Biological Infrastructure (DBI) 1340112NSF | Directorate for Biological Sciences (BIO) 1127112NSF | Directorate for Biological Sciences (BIO) 1340112
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spaceflight presents a multifaceted environment for plants, combining the effects on growth of many stressors and factors including altered gravity, the influence of experiment hardware, and increased radiation exposure. To help understand the plant response to this complex suite of factors this study compared transcriptomic analysis of 15 Arabidopsis thaliana spaceflight experiments deposited in the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's GeneLab data repository. These data were reanalyzed for genes showing significant differential expression in spaceflight versus ground controls using a single common computational pipeline for either the microarray or the RNA-seq datasets. Such a standardized approach to analysis should greatly increase the robustness of comparisons made between datasets. This analysis was coupled with extensive cross-referencing to a curated matrix of metadata associated with these experiments. Our study reveals that factors such as analysis type (i.e., microarray versus RNA-seq) or environmental and hardware conditions have important confounding effects on comparisons seeking to define plant reactions to spaceflight. The metadata matrix allows selection of studies with high similarity scores, i.e., that share multiple elements of experimental design, such as plant age or flight hardware. Comparisons between these studies then helps reduce the complexity in drawing conclusions arising from comparisons made between experiments with very different designs.

Identifiers

PMID36941263
PMCPMC10027818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read15
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.