ArticleNature communications2023
Evolutionary conservation of the fidelity of transcription.
Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- ZBP1 in Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration: Z-Nucleic-Acid Sensing, RHIM Signalling and Therapeutic Targeting.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Mistranslation suppresses mistranscription in eukaryotes.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Alterations of SLC14A1 mRNA structure are frequently detected in weak Jka presenting donors.PloS one · 2026Article
- Nascent RNA profiling reveals genome-wide productive reiterative initiation regulating gene transcription in bacteria.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Transcription fidelity and control of alternative splicing contribute to heat stress survival in Arabidopsis.The Plant cell · 2025Article
- The hidden costs of imperfection: transcription errors in protein aggregation diseases.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2025Review
- DNA Circle-sequencing lowers the single molecule sequencing error threshold and identifies ultrasonication as a source of DNA damage.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The mutational landscape of SARS-CoV-2 provides new insight into viral evolution and fitness.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Next-Generation Sequencing Methods to Determine the Accuracy of Retroviral Reverse Transcriptases: Advantages and Limitations.Viruses · 2025Review
- Development of a highly sensitive method to detect translational infidelity.Biology methods & protocols · 2025Article
- RNA Polymerase II Activity Control of Gene Expression and Involvement in Disease.Journal of molecular biology · 2025Review
- Linking Environmental Genotoxins to Neurodegenerative Diseases Through Transcriptional Mutagenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Transcript errors generate amyloid-like proteins in huwman cells.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Mitochondrial protein synthesis quality control.Human molecular genetics · 2024Review
- Emerging Roles of Vitamin BInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Targeted accurate RNA consensus sequencing (tARC-seq) reveals mechanisms of replication error affecting SARS-CoV-2 divergence.Nature microbiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate transcription is required for the faithful expression of genetic information. However, relatively little is known about the molecular mechanisms that control the fidelity of transcription, or the conservation of these mechanisms across the tree of life. To address these issues, we measured the error rate of transcription in five organisms of increasing complexity and found that the error rate of RNA polymerase II ranges from 2.9 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.