Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36941211›Full record

ArticleThe journal of sexual medicine2023

Understanding the sexual health perceptions, concerns, and needs of female partners of prostate cancer survivors.

Natasha Gupta, Laura Zebib, Daniela Wittmann, Christian J Nelson, Carolyn A Salter, John P Mulhall, Nataliya Byrne, Tatiana Sanchez Nolasco, Stacy Loeb

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of sexual medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Relationship Values and Committed Actions Among Couples Coping with Prostate Cancer: A Qualitative Study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Natasha GuptaDepartment of Urology, New York University, New York, NY 10016, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2782-415X
Laura ZebibDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.
Daniela WittmannDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.
Christian J NelsonDepartment of Psychiatry, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States.
Carolyn A SalterDepartment of Urology, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA 98431, United States.
John P MulhallDepartment of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States.
Nataliya ByrneDepartment of Urology, New York University, New York, NY 10016, United States.
Tatiana Sanchez NolascoDepartment of Urology, New York University, New York, NY 10016, United States.
Stacy LoebDepartment of Urology, New York University, New York, NY 10016, United States.
New York University · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversity of Michigan · USMadigan Army Medical Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Project-005UL1TR001445 · NCATS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BREDELLA, MIRIAM ANTOINETTE, HOCHMAN, JUDITH S · 2015 to 2025
$103.5M
Institutional Career DevelopmentKL2TR001446 · NCATS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI PILLINGER, MICHAEL · 2015 to 2025
$6.7M
NYU Training Program in Healthcare Delivery Science and Population Health ResearchT32HS026120 · AHRQ · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI HORWITZ, LEORA, SCHWARTZ, MARK D · 2018 to 2023
$3.4M
AHRQ HHS T32 HS026120NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001446NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001445NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIH HHS KL2TR001446
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate cancer (PCa) and its treatments can have a significant negative impact on the sexual health of survivors and couples, but few studies have specifically examined the impact of PCa-related sexual dysfunction on female partners of survivors.

aimOur objective was to perform a qualitative study to comprehensively characterize female partners' perceptions of the implications of PCa on their sex lives, as well as partners' sexual health concerns and unmet needs.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured telephone interviews about sexual health and unmet needs with female partners of PCa survivors recruited from multiple clinical locations and support groups for PCa caregivers from September 2021 to March 2022. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and independently coded. Participants were recruited until thematic saturation was achieved. OUTCOMES: Outcomes of this study were female partner sexual health concerns and unmet needs.

resultsAmong 12 participants, the median age was 65 (range 53 to 81) years, 9 were White, the median time since their partner's PCa diagnosis was 2.25 years (range 11 months to 20 years), and a majority reported that their partner had undergone radical prostatectomy, radiation, and/or hormonal therapy. Major emergent themes pertained to the significant impact of age- and PCa-related sexual dysfunction on female sexual quality of life, the dyadic nature of sexual dysfunction and recovery, the role of the partner in coping with and adjusting to sexual dysfunction, difficulties communicating about sexual dysfunction in an intimate relationship, a lack of physician-led sexual health counseling and support, and the benefit of peer interactions and proactive information seeking in addressing unmet sexual health needs. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Future efforts should continue to explore the impact of PCa on partner sexual health and address unmet needs through sexual health education and support. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: In this study, we identified female partners' sexual health concerns both related to and independent of PCa survivor sexual health. Limitations include exclusion of male partners of survivors and potential responder bias, as partners who agreed to participate may have experienced more sexual health concerns.

conclusionWe found that female partners experience PCa-related sexual dysfunction as a couple's disease, grief due to age- and PCa-related sexual losses, and a lack of physician-led sexual health counseling and information. Our results highlight the importance of including partners of PCa survivors in the sexual recovery process and of developing sexual care programs to address partners' unmet sexual health needs.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsProstatic NeoplasmsSexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalSexual HealthChildChild, PreschoolHumansMaleProstateQuality of LifeSexual PartnersSurvivorscouplesfemale sexual healthprostate cancerqualitativesexual dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID36941211
PMCPMC10149377
OpenAlexW4328048595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.