Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36941060›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2023

Environment Enrichment Facilitates Long-Term Memory Consolidation through Behavioral Tagging.

Medha Kaushik, Pooja Kaushik, Siddharth Panwar, Shiv Dutt Joshi, Suhel Parvez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Medha KaushikDepartment of Toxicology, School of Chemical and Life Sciences, New Delhi 110062, India.
Pooja KaushikDepartment of Toxicology, School of Chemical and Life Sciences, New Delhi 110062, India.
Siddharth PanwarSchool of Computing and Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh 175075, India.
Shiv Dutt JoshiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, New Delhi 110016, India.
Suhel ParvezDepartment of Toxicology, School of Chemical and Life Sciences, New Delhi 110062, India sparvez@jamiahamdard.ac.in.
Institute of Life Sciences · INIndian Institute of Technology Delhi · INIndian Institute of Technology Mandi · INJamia Hamdard · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The behavioral tagging (BT) hypothesis provides crucial insights into the mechanism of long-term memory (LTM) consolidation. Novelty exposure in BT is a decisive step in activating the molecular machinery of memory formation. Several studies have validated BT using different neurobehavioral tasks; however, the novelty given in all studies is open field (OF) exploration. Environment enrichment (EE) is another key experimental paradigm to explore the fundamentals of brain functioning. Recently, several studies have highlighted the importance of EE in enhancing cognition, LTM, and synaptic plasticity. Hence, in the present study, we investigated the effects of different types of novelty on LTM consolidation and plasticity-related protein (PRP) synthesis using the BT phenomenon. Novel object recognition (NOR) was used as the learning task for rodents (male Wistar rats), while OF and EE were two types of novel experiences provided to the rodents. Our results indicated that EE exposure efficiently leads to LTM consolidation through the BT phenomenon. In addition, EE exposure significantly enhances protein kinase Mζ (PKMζ) synthesis in the hippocampus region of the rat brain. However, the OF exposure did not lead to significant PKMζ expression. Further, our results did not find alterations in BDNF expression after EE and OF exposure in the hippocampus. Hence, it is concluded that different types of novelty mediate the BT phenomenon up to the same extent at the behavioral level. However, the implications of different novelties may differ at molecular levels.

Indexed as

Memory ConsolidationAnimalsHippocampusLearningMaleMemory, Long-TermNeuronal PlasticityRatsRats, Wistarlong-term memorynovel object recognitionnovelty exposurePKMζplasticity-related proteins

Identifiers

PMID36941060
PMCPMC10112550
OpenAlexW4327909807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.