ArticleBMJ open quality2023
POSTOPED: improving surveillance of postoperative delirium in a Scottish tertiary hospital.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of haloperidol's perioperative application on postoperative delirium in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC anesthesiology · 2024Pooled it
- High prevalence of unrecognized postoperative delirium in elderly patients: a prospective cohort study from a resource-limited country.Patient safety in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Delirium is the most common postoperative complication among patients over the age of 65 years. It is associated with increased morbidity and is a significant financial cost to healthcare systems.We aimed to improve the detection of delirium on the surgical wards of a tertiary surgical centre. This would take the form of completion of 4AT assessments (the 4 AT test for delirium, on admission and 1 day postoperatively). Prior to this project, the 4AT was in use in the surgical admission clerking paperwork for over 65 s, however, 4AT assessments were not routinely performed as part of day 1 postoperative assessment. By introducing routine postoperative assessment and reinforcing the importance of admission assessment, we hoped to allow for objective comparisons to be made about patients cognitive state and thereafter improve delirium identification.After a baseline snapshot data collection period, we conducted five (Plan, Do, Study, Act) cycles following which repeat snapshot data were collected. Improvement strategies included 'tea-trolley' teaching sessions, adhesive 4AT pro-forma, targeted accompaniment of specialty ward rounds with reminders to complete 4AT assessments and working with nursing staff to promote awareness of delirium among permanent non-rotating healthcare professionals.For the admission 4ATs, completion improved from a baseline of 74.1%-90.5% in cycle 5. Completion of postoperative 4AT assessments rose from 14.8% at baseline to 47.6% in cycle 5.We were able to improve the use of a delirium screening tool, (the 4AT) among the postoperative elderly population in this centre via the use of regular teaching sessions, targeted interventions on ward rounds as well working with non-rotating staff. Further improvements could be made by widening access to delirium champion programmes and including delirium as an outcome measure of national surgical audits such as the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.