ArticleBMJ open quality2023
Correlations between care users' and the healthcare inspectorate's ratings of the quality of care in long-term care homes.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the use of the input of care users in long-term care homes during 2020-2023 in the Netherlands: an exploratory study.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
- Involving Service Users in Care Regulation: A Scoping Review of Empirical Literature.International journal of health policy and management · 2025Article
- Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of the Spanish Version of the Person-Centred Practice Inventory-Staff (PCPI-S).Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The value of experts by experience in social domain supervision in the Netherlands: results from a 'mystery guests' project.BMC health services research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesIncreasing emphasis is being placed on person-centredness as a quality requirement for long-term care (LTC). Although healthcare inspectorates value the importance of care users' experiences, they struggle to address these experiences in regulatory practice. The aim of this study is to explore the correlations between care users' and the healthcare inspectorate's ratings of the quality of LTC in The Netherlands.
designThe correlations between care users' ratings from a public Dutch online patient rating site and the Dutch Health and Youth Care Inspectorate's ratings of the quality of care were examined using Spearman rank correlations. The inspectorate's ratings cover three themes: 'attention to person-centred care', 'working towards sufficient and competent care staff' and 'focusing on quality and safety'.
settingRatings of the quality of care were obtained for 200 LTC homes in The Netherlands between January 2017 and March 2019. These LTC homes had 6 to 350 residents (M=89; SD=57) and belonged to organisations with 1-40 LTC homes in total (M=6; SD=6).
participantsPublicly available anonymous ratings of the perceived quality of care by care users were extracted from the Dutch patient rating website 'www.zorgkaartnederland.nl'. Care users' ratings were available for the 2 years prior to an assessment by the inspectorate for 200 LTC homes.
resultsWe found a weak, significant correlation between the mean care users' ratings and the inspectorate's aggregated scores for the theme 'person-centred care' (r=0.26, N=200, p
conclusionsThis study showed only a weak correlation between care users' ratings and ratings of the Dutch Inspectorate of the quality of 'person-centred care' in LTC homes. Therefore, it may be fruitful to intensify or innovate approaches to involve care users' experiences in regulation to do them justice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.