Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36940407›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2023

Isolated Hepatic Perfusion With Melphalan for Patients With Isolated Uveal Melanoma Liver Metastases: A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial (the SCANDIUM Trial).

Roger Olofsson Bagge, Axel Nelson, Amir Shafazand, Charlotta All-Eriksson, Christian Cahlin, Nils Elander, Hildur Helgadottir, Jens Folke Kiilgaard, Sara Kinhult, Ingrid Ljuslinder and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01785316 (The Scandinavian Randomized Controlled Trial of Isolated Hepatic Perfusion for Uveal Melanoma Liver Metastases), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
18.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01785316 phase3completednot on this map

The Scandinavian Randomized Controlled Trial of Isolated Hepatic Perfusion for Uveal Melanoma Liver Metastases

TypeinterventionalSponsorVastra Gotaland RegionRan2013 to 2023Enrolled93ConditionsMelanoma, Uveal NeoplasmsArmsIHP
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Potential of Nanoparticle-Based Phototherapies for Future Treatment of Uveal Melanoma.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. The latestExpert opinion on drug discovery · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Management of liver metastases from uveal melanoma.The British journal of surgery · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Roger Olofsson BaggeSahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5795-0355
Axel NelsonDepartment of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Amir ShafazandWallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8037-574X
Charlotta All-ErikssonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mölndal Hospital, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Christian CahlinTransplant Institute, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Nils ElanderDepartment of Oncology and Department of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9345-0278
Hildur HelgadottirDepartment of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jens Folke KiilgaardDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1054-1460
Sara KinhultDepartment of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Ingrid LjuslinderDepartment of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden.
Jan MattssonDepartment of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2266-7629
Magnus RizellTransplant Institute, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9791-5247
Malin Sternby EilardTransplant Institute, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5274-7726
Gustav J UllenhagDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology (IGP), Science for Life Laboratories, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Jonas A NilssonSahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0346-6837
Lars NyDepartment of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3864-5958
Per LindnérTransplant Institute, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sahlgrenska University Hospital · SECopenhagen University Hospital · DKKarolinska University Hospital · SELinköping University · SESkåne University Hospital · SEUmeå University · SEUniversity of Gothenburg · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAbout half of patients with metastatic uveal melanoma present with isolated liver metastasis, in whom the median survival is 6-12 months. The few systemic treatment options available only moderately prolong survival. Isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) with melphalan is a regional treatment option, but prospective efficacy and safety data are lacking.

methodsIn this multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III trial, patients with previously untreated isolated liver metastases from uveal melanoma were randomly assigned to receive a one-time treatment with IHP with melphalan or best alternative care (control group). The primary end point was overall survival at 24 months. Here, we report the secondary outcomes of response according to RECIST 1.1 criteria, progression-free survival (PFS), hepatic PFS (hPFS), and safety.

resultsNinety-three patients were randomly assigned, and 87 patients were assigned to either IHP (n = 43) or a control group receiving the investigator's choice of treatment (n = 44). In the control group, 49% received chemotherapy, 39% immune checkpoint inhibitors, and 9% locoregional treatment other than IHP. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the overall response rates (ORRs) were 40% versus 4.5% in the IHP and control groups, respectively (

conclusionIHP treatment resulted in superior ORR, hPFS, and PFS compared with best alternative care in previously untreated patients with isolated liver metastases from primary uveal melanoma.

Indexed as

Liver NeoplasmsMelphalanChemotherapy, Cancer, Regional PerfusionHumansMelanomaPerfusionProspective StudiesScandiumUveal MelanomaUveal NeoplasmsMelphalanScandium

Identifiers

PMID36940407
PMCPMC10414734
OpenAlexW4327912913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.