ArticlePloS one2023
Development of a digital imaging analysis system to evaluate the treatment response in superficial infantile hemangiomas.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of the efficacy of oral propranolol combined with pulsed dye laser versus monotherapy with oral propranolol in the treatment of mixed infantile hemangiomas.Lasers in medical science · 2026Article
- Development of a digital image analysis system for objective evaluation of treatment response in cellulitis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Advancing infantile hemangioma diagnosis by integrating temperature, color, and texture.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
- Digital Imaging and Artificial Intelligence in Infantile Hemangioma: A Systematic Literature Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Letter to the Editor Regarding "Prospective Study to Assess the Utility and Validity of a Chromameter in the Assessment of Infantile Hemangiomas".Pediatric dermatologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Superficial infantile hemangiomas (IH) are benign vascular tumors common in children characterized by bright red "strawberry" lesions on the skin. In order to optimize the treatment for this disease, there is a need to develop objective tools to assess treatment response. Since a color change in the lesion is a good indicator of treatment response, we have developed a digital imaging system to quantify the values of red, green, and blue (RGB) difference and RGB ratio between the tumor and normal tissue to take into account the variations in color between different skin types. The efficacy of the proposed system in assessing treatment response in superficial IH was evaluated in relation to established visual and biochemical tools used to grade hemangiomas. As the treatment progressed, the RGB ratio was almost 1, while the RGB difference was close to 0, which indicates a good response to treatment. There was a strong correlation between the RGB score and the other visual grading systems. However, the correlation between the RGB scoring system and the biochemical method was weak. These findings suggest that the system can be used clinically to objectively and accurately evaluate disease progression and treatment response in patients diagnosed with superficial IH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.