Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36940144›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53

Personalized Depression Prevention Reduces Dependent Stressors Among Adolescents: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Jason D Jones, Erin E Long, Benjamin L Hankin, Robert Gallop, Molly Davis, Jami F Young

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jason D JonesDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Erin E LongDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Benjamin L HankinDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Robert GallopDepartment of Mathematics, West Chester University.
Molly DavisDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Jami F YoungDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.

Funding

Genetic cognitive and interpersonal vulnerabilities to depression in youthR01MH077178 · NIMH · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI YOUNG, JAMI F · 2007 to 2017
$3.6M
Genetic cognitive and interpersonal vulnerabilities to depression in youthR01MH077195 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI HANKIN, BENJAMIN L · 2007 to 2017
$3.4M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH077178NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH077195
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDepression and stressors both increase during adolescence. The stress generation model posits that depression symptoms and associated impairment contribute to the generation of dependent stressors. Adolescent depression prevention programs have been shown to reduce the risk of depression. Recently, risk-informed personalization approaches have been adopted to enhance the efficacy of depression prevention, and preliminary evidence supports the beneficial effects of personalized prevention on depression symptoms. Given the close association between depression and stress, we examined the hypothesis that personalized depression prevention programs would reduce adolescents' experience of dependent stressors (interpersonal and non-interpersonal) over longitudinal follow-up.

methodThe present study included 204 adolescents (56% girls, 29% racial minority) who were randomized to receive either a cognitive-behavioral or an interpersonal prevention program. Youth were categorized as high or low on cognitive and interpersonal risk using a previously established risk classification system. Half of the adolescents received a prevention program that matched their risk profile (e.g., high cognitive risk randomized to cognitive-behavioral prevention); half received a mismatched program (e.g., high interpersonal risk randomized to cognitive-behavioral prevention). Exposure to dependent and independent stressors was assessed repeatedly over an 18-month follow-up period.

resultsMatched adolescents reported fewer dependent stressors during the post-intervention follow-up period (

conclusionsThese findings further highlight the potential of personalized approaches to depression prevention and demonstrate benefits that go beyond depression symptom reduction.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyDepressionInterpersonal RelationsStress, PsychologicalAdolescentFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID36940144
PMCPMC10509329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.