Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36940041›Full record

ArticleCognitive research: principles and implications2023

Evaluating the effectiveness of different perceptual training methods in a difficult visual discrimination task with ultrasound images.

Jessica E Marris, Andrew Perfors, David Mitchell, Wayland Wang, Mark W McCusker, Timothy John Haynes Lovell, Robert N Gibson, Frank Gaillard, Piers D L Howe

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jessica E MarrisMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia. jess.e.marris@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2658-3016
Andrew PerforsMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
David MitchellRadiology, Sligo University Hospital, Sligo, Ireland.
Wayland WangDepartment of Radiology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia.
Mark W McCuskerDepartment of Radiology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia.
Timothy John Haynes LovellDepartment of Radiology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia.
Robert N GibsonDepartment of Radiology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia.
Frank GaillardDepartment of Radiology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia.
Piers D L HoweMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
The Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent work has shown that perceptual training can be used to improve the performance of novices in real-world visual classification tasks with medical images, but it is unclear which perceptual training methods are the most effective, especially for difficult medical image discrimination tasks. We investigated several different perceptual training methods with medically naïve participants in a difficult radiology task: identifying the degree of hepatic steatosis (fatty infiltration of the liver) in liver ultrasound images. In Experiment 1a (N = 90), participants completed four sessions of standard perceptual training, and participants in Experiment 1b (N = 71) completed four sessions of comparison training. There was a significant post-training improvement for both types of training, although performance was better when the trained task aligned with the task participants were tested on. In both experiments, performance initially improves rapidly, with learning becoming more gradual after the first training session. In Experiment 2 (N = 200), we explored the hypothesis that performance could be improved by combining perceptual training with explicit annotated feedback presented in a stepwise fashion. Although participants improved in all training conditions, performance was similar regardless of whether participants were given annotations, or underwent training in a stepwise fashion, both, or neither. Overall, we found that perceptual training can rapidly improve performance on a difficult radiology task, albeit not to a comparable level as expert performance, and that similar levels of performance were achieved across the perceptual training paradigms we compared.

Indexed as

LearningVisual PerceptionDiscrimination, PsychologicalHumansRadiographyPerceptual expertisePerceptual learningPerceptual trainingRadiology

Identifiers

PMID36940041
PMCPMC10027970
OpenAlexW4327893749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read68
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.