Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36940010›Full record

ArticleJournal, genetic engineering & biotechnology2023

Insights on the interaction of SARS-CoV-2 variant B.1.617.2 with antibody CR3022 and analysis of antibody resistance.

Sandhya Ks, Achuthsankar S Nair

Open access · diamondFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sandhya KsDepartment of Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, University of Kerala, Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram, India. drkssandhya@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3628-0521
Achuthsankar S NairDepartment of Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, University of Kerala, Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram, India.
University of Kerala · IN

Funding

SERB-NPDF PDF/2020/001703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe existence of mutated Delta (B.1.617.2) variants of SARS-CoV-2 causes rapid transmissibility, increase in virulence, and decrease in the effectiveness of public health. Majority of mutations are seen in the surface spike, and they are considered as antigenicity and immunogenicity of the virus. Hence, finding suitable cross antibody or natural antibody and understanding its biomolecular recognition for neutralizing surface spike are crucial for developing many clinically approved COVID-19 vaccines. Here, we aim to design SARS-CoV-2 variant and hence, to understand its mechanism, binding affinity and neutralization potential with several antibodies.

resultsIn this study, we modelled six feasible spike protein (S1) configurations for Delta SARS-CoV-2 (B.1.617.2) and identified the best structure to interact with human antibodies. Initially, the impact of mutations at the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of B.1.617.2 was tested, and it is found that all mutations increase the stability of proteins (ΔΔG) and decrease the entropies. An exceptional case is noted for the mutation of G614D variant for which the vibration entropy change is found to be within the range of 0.133-0.004 kcal/mol/K. Temperature-dependent free energy change values (ΔG) for wild type is found to be - 0.1 kcal/mol, whereas all other cases exhibit values within the range of - 5.1 to - 5.5 kcal/mol. Mutation on spike increases the interaction with the glycoprotein antibody CR3022 and the binding affinity (CLUSpro energy =  - 99.7 kcal/mol). The docked Delta variant with the following antibodies, etesevimab, bebtelovimab, BD-368-2, imdevimab, bamlanivimab, and casirivimab, exhibit a substantially decreased docking score (- 61.7 to - 112.0 kcal/mol) and the disappearance of several hydrogen bond interactions.

conclusionCharacterization of antibody resistance for Delta variant with respect to the wild type gives understanding regarding why Delta variant endures the resistance boosted through several trademark vaccines. Several interactions with CR3022 have appeared compared to Wild for Delta variant, and hence, it is suggested that modification on the CR3022 antibody could further improve for the prevention of viral spread. Antibody resistance decreased significantly due to numerous hydrogen bond interactions which clearly indicate that these marketed/launched vaccines (etesevimab) will be effective for Delta variants.

Indexed as

CR3022DeltaHomology modellingMolecular dockingMolecular dynamicsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36940010
PMCPMC10026237
OpenAlexW4327894648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read9
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.