ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2023
Pulmonary perfusion defect volume on dual-energy CT: prognostic marker of adverse events in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of a lung perfusion automated quantitative model based on dual-energy CT pulmonary angiography in patients with chronic pulmonary thromboembolism.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Differentiating pulmonary embolism from contrast accumulation-induced beam hardening artifacts using dual-energy CT quantitative parameters.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Enhancing diagnostic precision for acute chest syndrome in sickle cell disease: insights from dual-energy CT lung perfusion mapping.Emergency radiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To assess whether quantification of pulmonary perfusion defects on dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) relates to adverse events beyond clinical parameters and traditional embolus detection in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). We included consecutive patients who underwent DECT to rule out acute PE in 2018-2020 and recorded incident adverse events, defined as a composite of short-term (< 30 days) in-hospital all-cause mortality or admission to intensive care unit. Relative perfusion defect volume (PDV) was measured on DECT and indexed by total lung volume. PDV was then related to adverse events using logistic regressions adjusting for clinical parameters, clinical PE pre-test probability (Wells score), and visual PE burden on pulmonary angiography (Qanadli score). Among 136 included patients (63 [46%] females; age: 70 ± 14 years), 19/136 (14%) experienced adverse events during a median hospitalization of 7.5 (4-14) days. Overall, 7/19 (37%) events occurred in those without visible emboli but with measurable perfusion defects. An increase of PDV by one standard deviation was associated with over two times higher odds of adverse events (OR = 2.24; 95%CI:1.37-3.65; p = 0.001). This association remained significant after adjusting for the Wells and Qanadli scores (OR = 2.34; 95%CI:1.20-4.60; p = 0.013). PDV significantly increased the combined discriminatory capacity of Wells and Qanadli scores (AUC 0.76 vs. 0.80; p = 0.011 for difference). DECT-derived PDV may represent a prognostic imaging marker with incremental value beyond clinical and traditional imaging findings, improving risk stratification and aiding clinical management in patients with suspected PE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.