Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36939798›Full record

ArticlePhenomics (Cham, Switzerland)2021

Random Penetrance of Mutations Among Individuals: A New Type of Genetic Drift in Molecular Evolution.

Xun Gu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Phenomics (Cham, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xun GuDepartment of Genetics, Development and Cell Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011 USA.
Iowa State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The determinative view of mutation penetrance is a fundamental assumption for the building of molecular evolutionary theory: individuals in the population with the same genotype have the same fitness effect. Since this view has been constantly challenged by experimental evidence, it is desirable to examine to what extent violation of this view could affect our understanding of molecular evolution. To this end, the author formulated a new theory of molecular evolution under a random model of penetrance: for any individual with the same mutational genotype, the coefficient of selection is a random variable. It follows that, in addition to the conventional

Indexed as

Effective population sizeGenetic driftNearly neutral evolutionRandom penetranceRate of molecular evolution

Identifiers

PMID36939798
PMCPMC9590493
OpenAlexW3175114022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.