Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36939773›Full record

ReviewPhenomics (Cham, Switzerland)2022

A Comprehensive Review of High Throughput Phenotyping and Machine Learning for Plant Stress Phenotyping.

Taqdeer Gill, Simranveer K Gill, Dinesh K Saini, Yuvraj Chopra, Jason P de Koff, Karansher S Sandhu

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Phenomics (Cham, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
47.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 248 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Unlocking the potential of spring wheat genetic resources: uncovering resistance sources against leaf rust and yellow rust.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Harnessing artificial intelligence in plant breeding: innovations in digital phenotyping and breeding methodologies.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Regional Cultivation Forms ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The future is FAIR: a community framework for enhanced data management and data sharing.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Taqdeer GillDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Tennessee State University, Nashville, TN 37209 USA.
Simranveer K GillCollege of Agriculture, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141004 India.
Dinesh K SainiDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141004 India.
Yuvraj ChopraCollege of Agriculture, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141004 India.
Jason P de KoffDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Tennessee State University, Nashville, TN 37209 USA.
Karansher S SandhuDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99163 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9395-2646
Punjab Agricultural University · INTennessee State University · USWashington State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the last decade, there has been rapid adoption of ground and aerial platforms with multiple sensors for phenotyping various biotic and abiotic stresses throughout the developmental stages of the crop plant. High throughput phenotyping (HTP) involves the application of these tools to phenotype the plants and can vary from ground-based imaging to aerial phenotyping to remote sensing. Adoption of these HTP tools has tried to reduce the phenotyping bottleneck in breeding programs and help to increase the pace of genetic gain. More specifically, several root phenotyping tools are discussed to study the plant's hidden half and an area long neglected. However, the use of these HTP technologies produces big data sets that impede the inference from those datasets. Machine learning and deep learning provide an alternative opportunity for the extraction of useful information for making conclusions. These are interdisciplinary approaches for data analysis using probability, statistics, classification, regression, decision theory, data visualization, and neural networks to relate information extracted with the phenotypes obtained. These techniques use feature extraction, identification, classification, and prediction criteria to identify pertinent data for use in plant breeding and pathology activities. This review focuses on the recent findings where machine learning and deep learning approaches have been used for plant stress phenotyping with data being collected using various HTP platforms. We have provided a comprehensive overview of different machine learning and deep learning tools available with their potential advantages and pitfalls. Overall, this review provides an avenue for studying various HTP platforms with particular emphasis on using the machine learning and deep learning tools for drawing legitimate conclusions. Finally, we propose the conceptual challenges being faced and provide insights on future perspectives for managing those issues.

Indexed as

Biotic and abiotic stressesDeep learningGround-based imagingHigh throughput phenotypingMachine learningUnmanned aerial vehicle

Identifiers

PMID36939773
PMCPMC9590503
OpenAlexW4225774212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.