ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2023
Progression of Early Glaucomatous Damage: Performance of Summary Statistics From Optical Coherence Tomography and Perimetry.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nicotinamide and Pyruvate in Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Neuroprotection-Design and Methodology.Ophthalmology. GlaucomaTrial
- Labeling matters: A multicenter machine learning study on visual field progression in Glaucoma.PloS one · 2026Article
- A Model of Progression to Help Identify Macular Damage Due to Glaucoma.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Performance comparison of optical coherence tomography (OCT) and visual field (VF) summary metrics for detecting glaucomatous progression. Methods: Thirty healthy control eyes (mean deviation [MD], -1.25 ± 2.03; pattern standard deviation [PSD] , 1.78 ± 0.77) and 91 patient eyes comprised of 54 glaucoma patients and 37 glaucoma suspects (MD, -1.58 ± 1.96; PSD, 2.82 ± 1.92) with a follow-up of at least 1 year formed a group to evaluate progression with event analyses (P-Event). A subset of eyes with an additional criterion of a minimum of four tests was used for trend analyses (P-Trend) (30 healthy controls and 73 patients). For P-Event analysis, test-retest variability thresholds (lower 5th percentile) were estimated with repeat tests within a 4-month period. A P-Event eye was considered a "progressor" if the difference between follow-up and baseline tests exceeded the variability thresholds. For the P-Trend analysis, rates of change were calculated based on least-squares regression. Negative rates with significant (P < 0.05) values were considered progressing. For a reference standard, 17 patient eyes were classified as definitely progressing based on clear evidence of structural and corresponding functional progression. Results: Isolated OCT and VF summary metrics were either inadequately sensitive or not too specific. Combinations of OCT-OCT and OCT-VF metrics markedly improved specificity to nearly 100%. A novel combination of OCT metrics (circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell layer) showed high precision, with 13 of the 15 statistical progressors confirmed as true positives. Conclusions: Although relying solely on metrics is not recommended for clinical purposes, in situations requiring very high specificity and precision, combinations of OCT-OCT metrics can be used. Translational Relevance: All available OCT and VF metrics can miss eyes with progressive glaucomatous damage and/or can falsely identify progression in stable eyes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.