Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36939670›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2023

The Initial Relationship Between the United States Department of Health and Human Services' Digital COVID-19 Public Education Campaign and Vaccine Uptake: Campaign Effectiveness Evaluation.

Christopher J Williams, Elissa C Kranzler, Joseph N Luchman, Benjamin Denison, Sean Fischer, Thomas Wonder, Ronne Ostby, Monica Vines, Jessica Weinberg, Elizabeth L Petrun Sayers and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Assessing the reach and engagement with the 'Drugs (Abingdon, England) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher J WilliamsFors Marsh, Arlington, VA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2002-6326
Elissa C KranzlerFors Marsh, Arlington, VA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4492-5817
Joseph N LuchmanFors Marsh, Arlington, VA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8886-9717
Benjamin DenisonFors Marsh, Arlington, VA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3671-2176
Sean FischerFors Marsh, Arlington, VA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6126-4155
Thomas WonderFors Marsh, Arlington, VA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3121-4031
Ronne OstbyFors Marsh, Arlington, VA, United States.ORCID 0009-0009-9415-4345
Monica VinesUS Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4314-2397
Jessica WeinbergUS Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0419-1409
Elizabeth L Petrun SayersUS Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6796-6350
Allison N KurtiUS Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1018-8345
Sarah TriggerUS Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9982-4349
Leah HoffmanFors Marsh, Arlington, VA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8153-3866
Joshua F A PeckUS Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8522-0437
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health · US

Funding

EO14042 DEVELOPMENT, STATISTICAL DESIGN, MONITORING AND COORDINATION OF VISION CLINICAL TRIALS AND EPIDEMIOLOGY RESEARCH75N98022C00001 · OD · THE EMMES COMPANY, LLC · PI MENEZES, SUPRIYA · 2022 to 2025
$25.3M
NIA COMMUNICATION ACTIVITIES TO SUPPORT THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR RECRUITMENT AND PARTICIPATION IN ALZHEIMER'S AND RELATED DEMENTIAS CLINICAL RESEARC75N98019D00007 · NIDA · FORS MARSH GROUP LLC · PI ANDREW, HALE · 2019 to 2021
$2.9M
NIDA NIH HHS 75N98019D00007NIH HHS 75N98019D00010NIH HHS 75N98022C00001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver 1 million people in the United States have died of COVID-19. In response to this public health crisis, the US Department of Health and Human Services launched the We Can Do This public education campaign in April 2021 to increase vaccine confidence. The campaign uses a mix of digital, television, print, radio, and out-of-home channels to reach target audiences. However, the impact of this campaign on vaccine uptake has not yet been assessed.

objectiveWe aimed to address this gap by assessing the association between the We Can Do This COVID-19 public education campaign's digital impressions and the likelihood of first-dose COVID-19 vaccination among US adults.

methodsA nationally representative sample of 3642 adults recruited from a US probability panel was surveyed over 3 waves (wave 1: January to February 2021; wave 2: May to June 2021; and wave 3: September to November 2021) regarding COVID-19 vaccination, vaccine confidence, and sociodemographics. Survey data were merged with weekly paid digital campaign impressions delivered to each respondent's media market (designated market area [DMA]) during that period. The unit of analysis was the survey respondent-broadcast week, with respondents nested by DMA. Data were analyzed using a multilevel logit model with varying intercepts by DMA and time-fixed effects.

resultsThe We Can Do This digital campaign was successful in encouraging first-dose COVID-19 vaccination. The findings were robust to multiple modeling specifications, with the independent effect of the change in the campaign's digital dose remaining practically unchanged across all models. Increases in DMA-level paid digital campaign impressions in a given week from -30,000 to 30,000 increased the likelihood of first-dose COVID-19 vaccination by 125%.

conclusionsResults from this study provide initial evidence of the We Can Do This campaign's digital impact on vaccine uptake. The size and length of the Department of Health and Human Services We Can Do This public education campaign make it uniquely situated to examine the impact of a digital campaign on COVID-19 vaccination, which may help inform future vaccine communication efforts and broader public education efforts. These findings suggest that campaign digital dose is positively associated with COVID-19 vaccination uptake among US adults; future research assessing campaign impact on reduced COVID-19-attributed morbidity and mortality and other benefits is recommended. This study indicates that digital channels have played an important role in the COVID-19 pandemic response. Digital outreach may be integral in addressing future pandemics and could even play a role in addressing nonpandemic public health crises.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultCOVID-19 VaccinesHealth PromotionHumansPandemicsUnited StatesUnited States Dept. of Health and Human ServicesVaccinationCOVID-19 Vaccinescampaigncommunication campaignCOVID-19COVID-19 pandemicCOVID-19 vaccinationdigital impressionmarketingpatient educationpublic educationpublic education campaignpublic health campaignsocial marketingUnited Statesvaccinationvaccine

Identifiers

PMID36939670
PMCPMC10158813
OpenAlexW4327898530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.