Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36938878›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2024

Report on the AAPM deep-learning spectral CT Grand Challenge.

Emil Y Sidky, Xiaochuan Pan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Systematic Review on Learning-based Spectral CT.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emil Y SidkyDepartment of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Xiaochuan PanDepartment of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Funding

Advanced iterative image reconstruction for digital breast tomosynthesis - Resubmission 01R01EB026282 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI PAN, XIAOCHUAN, SIDKY, EMIL Y · 2018 to 2021
$2.1M
Spectral CT metal artifact correctionR01EB023968 · NIBIB · MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHMIDT, TALY GILAT, SIDKY, EMIL Y · 2019 to 2022
$1.4M
Algorithm-Enabled Auto-Calibrating Quantitative Dual-Energy CTR21CA263660 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI PAN, XIAOCHUAN · 2022 to 2023
$414k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA263660NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB023968NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB026282
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis Special Report summarizes the 2022 AAPM Grand Challenge on Deep-Learning spectral Computed Tomography (DL-spectral CT) image reconstruction. PURPOSE: The purpose of the challenge is to develop the most accurate image reconstruction algorithm possible for solving the inverse problem associated with a fast kilovolt switching dual-energy CT scan using a three tissue-map decomposition. Participants could choose to use a deep-learning (DL), iterative, or a hybrid approach.

methodsThe challenge is based on a 2D breast CT simulation, where the simulated breast phantom consists of three tissue maps: adipose, fibroglandular, and calcification distributions. The phantom specification is stochastic so that multiple realizations can be generated for DL approaches. A dual-energy scan is simulated where the x-ray source potential of successive views alternates between 50 and 80 kilovolts (kV). A total of 512 views are generated, yielding 256 views for each source voltage. We generate 50 and 80 kV images by use of filtered back-projection (FBP) on negative logarithm processed transmission data. For participants who develop a DL approach, 1000 cases are available. Each case consists of the three 512 × 512 tissue maps, 50 and 80-kV transmission data sets and their corresponding FBP images. The goal of the DL network would then be to predict the material maps from either the transmission data, FBP images, or a combination of the two. For participants developing a physics-based approach, all of the required modeling parameters are made available: geometry, spectra, and tissue attenuation curves. The provided information also allows for hybrid approaches where physics is exploited as well as information about the scanned object derived from the 1000 training cases. Final testing is performed by computation of root-mean-square error (RMSE) for predictions on the tissue maps from 100 new cases.

resultsTest phase submission were received from 18 research groups. Of the 18 submissions, 17 were results obtained with algorithms that involved DL. Only the second place finishing team developed a physics-based image reconstruction algorithm. Both the winning and second place teams had highly accurate results where the RMSE was nearly zero to single floating point precision. Results from the top 10 also achieved a high degree of accuracy; and as a result, this special report outlines the methodology developed by each of these groups.

conclusionsThe DL-spectral CT challenge successfully established a forum for developing image reconstruction algorithms that address an important inverse problem relevant for spectral CT.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAlgorithmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhantoms, ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedX-Raysadaptive radiotherapydeformable image registrationquality assurance

Identifiers

PMID36938878
PMCPMC10509324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.