Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36938648›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2023

The differential effects of sarcopenia and cachexia on overall survival for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients following pancreatectomy: A retrospective study based on a large population.

Xiao-Ding Shen, Xing Wang, Zhen-Jiang Zheng, Yong-Hua Chen, Chun-Lu Tan, Xu-Bao Liu, Neng-Wen Ke

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Pancreatic cancer and sarcopenia: a narrative review of the current status.International journal of clinical oncology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiao-Ding ShenDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xing WangDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Zhen-Jiang ZhengDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yong-Hua ChenDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Chun-Lu TanDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7280-8776
Xu-Bao LiuDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Neng-Wen KeDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7135-2244
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesBoth cachexia and sarcopenia have been considered adverse predictors for prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer; although sarcopenia and cachexia share some similarities, they are still defined as distinct nutritional conditions. We aimed to explore the differential impacts of sarcopenia and cachexia on prognosis for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients following radical excision.

methodsFrom January 2015 to May 2022, 614 patients undergoing surgery for PDAC were retrospectively included. Sarcopenia was defined as the L3 total skeletal muscle index below 52.4 cm

resultsOf the 614 patients included in the analysis, 62% and 48% were diagnosed with sarcopenia and cachexia, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that sarcopenia and/or cachexia were significantly associated with worse overall survival (OS) rather than worse recurrence-free survival (RFS). Moreover, Cox regression analysis revealed that cachexia rather than sarcopenia was an adverse factor for OS in all PDAC patients. For poorly differentiated PDAC, both cachexia and sarcopenia were significantly associated with shorter OS. However, for moderately/well-differentiated PADC, cachexia was an independent factor for adverse OS, but not sarcopenia.

conclusionsSarcopenia and cachexia have different effects on OS for PDAC patients undergoing radical excision. This difference may provide some important information for preoperative management.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalPancreatic NeoplasmsSarcopeniaCachexiaFemaleHumansMalePancreatectomyPrognosisRetrospective StudiesWeight Losscachexiaoverall survivalpancreatectomypancreatic ductal adenocarcinomasarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID36938648
PMCPMC10225236
OpenAlexW4327892897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.