Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36938559›Full record

ReviewActa clinica Croatica2022

SENHANCE ROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY.

Tomislav Kuliš, Tvrtko Hudolin, Luka Penezić, Toni Zekulić, Hrvoje Saić, Tomislav Sambolić, Iva Bačak Kocman, Eleonora Goluža, Nikola Knežević, Željko Kaštelan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta clinica Croatica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tomislav KulišDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Tvrtko HudolinDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Luka PenezićDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Toni ZekulićDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Hrvoje SaićDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Tomislav SambolićUniversity of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
Iva Bačak KocmanUniversity of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
Eleonora GolužaUniversity of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
Nikola KneževićDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Željko KaštelanDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since its introduction 20 years ago, robotic radical prostatectomy has become a standard of care in the treatment of localized prostate cancer in many Centers. Until recently, they have all been performed by the only available robotic platform. Senhance is a novel robotic platform that was approved for clinical use. The term Senhance was used to systematically search PubMed and Scopus databases for relevant articles that were afterward filtered for appropriate designs and data reports. There were two reports that met all of the criteria and were included in the review. Both studies were designed as prospective case series with a total of 234 patients where the data including operative data and oncological outcomes were reported. The average operative time ranged between 180 and 195 min, with estimated blood loss between 250 and 300 mL. There was 3 Clavien - Dindo grade III, and 1 Clavien - DIndo grade IV complication reported. One of the studies compared it with laparoscopy, but no significant difference in operative time and blood loss was found. Both studies concluded that the Senhance is a feasible and safe robotic platform for radical prostatectomy.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyProstatic NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansMaleProstatectomyTreatment OutcomeRobotic prostatectomy: Prostate cancerSenhance

Identifiers

PMID36938559
PMCPMC10022409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.