Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36938547›Full record

ReviewActa clinica Croatica2022

CURRENT ROLE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN THE SCREENING, DIAGNOSIS, AND TREATMENT OF PROSTATE CANCER.

Sven Nikles, Ivan Pezelj, Miroslav Tomić, Matej Knežević, Borna Vrhovec, Leo Dumbović, Matea Pirša, Ivana Kavelj, Igor Tomašković

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta clinica Croatica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Prostate Cancer Screening: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices by Medical Doctors in Portugal.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. A machine learning model incorporatingQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sven NiklesDepartment of Urology, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia.
Ivan PezeljDepartment of Urology, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia.
Miroslav TomićDepartment of Urology, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia.
Matej KneževićDepartment of Urology, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia.
Borna VrhovecDepartment of Urology, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia.
Leo DumbovićDepartment of Urology, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia.
Matea PiršaDepartment of Urology, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia.
Ivana KaveljDepartment of Radiology, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia.
Igor TomaškovićDepartment of Urology, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men. Diagnosis of prostate cancer poses a significant challenge, due to several different key parameters that need to be evaluated, such as age, history of prostate specific antigen (PSA), clinical examination and more recently magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The current diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer has resulted in overdiagnosis and overtreatment as well as underdiagnosis and missed diagnoses in many men. Multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI) of the prostate has been identified as a test that could alleviate these diagnostic errors. Before prostate cancer treatment pathological confirmation is mandatory. Prostate biopsy is an invasive procedure with rare but not negligible potential complications. There are several methods of prostate biopsy of which most common are systemic or planar prostate biopsy and cognitive or targeted MRI-guided prostate biopsy. Multiparametric MRI has demonstrated better accuracy and reproducibility in detecting, locating and evaluating prostate cancer and also sparing some men unnecessary biopsies. Recent studies have shown a mpMRI benefit for better procedure planning regarding prostate cancer location, extent of disease and length of the urethra. There are still some challenges ahead, such as ensuring high-quality execution and reporting of mpMRI and ensuring that this diagnostic pathway is cost-effective. According to the latest urological clinical guidelines mpMRI became fundamental tool in management of prostate cancer. The aim of this study is to give a brief insight in use of mpMRI in prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerProstatic NeoplasmsHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleProstate-Specific AntigenReproducibility of ResultsProstate-Specific AntigenmpMRIprostate biopsyprostate cancerprostate cancer diagnosis and treatment

Identifiers

PMID36938547
PMCPMC10022408
OpenAlexW4327900071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.