Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36938540›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2023

Elasticity and substitutability of food demand and emerging disease risk on livestock farms.

Alexis Delabouglise, Guillaume Fournié, Marisa Peyre, Nicolas Antoine-Moussiaux, Maciej F Boni

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Alexis DelabougliseCIRAD, UMR ASTRE, Montpellier 34398, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5837-7052
Guillaume FourniéDepartment of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, Veterinary Epidemiology, Economics and Public Health Group, University of London, Hawkshead Lane, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL97TA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6998-1201
Marisa PeyreCIRAD, UMR ASTRE, Montpellier 34398, France.
Nicolas Antoine-MoussiauxFARAH-Fundamental and Applied Research for Animals and Health, University of Liège, Avenue de Cureghem 7A-7D, Liège 4000, Belgium.
Maciej F BoniDepartment of Biology, Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FRPennsylvania State University · USUniversity of Liège · BEUniversity of London · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L018993/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disease emergence in livestock is a product of environment, epidemiology and economic forces. The environmental factors contributing to novel pathogen emergence in humans have been studied extensively, but the two-way relationship between farm microeconomics and outbreak risk has received comparably little attention. We introduce a game-theoretic model where farmers produce and sell two goods, one of which (e.g. pigs, poultry) is susceptible to infection by a pathogen. We model market and epidemiological effects at both the individual farm level and the community level. We find that in the case of low demand elasticity for livestock meat, the presence of an animal pathogen causing production losses can lead to a bistable system where two outcomes are possible: (i) successful disease control or (ii) maintained disease circulation, where farmers slaughter their animals at a low rate, face substantial production losses, but maintain large herds because of the appeal of high meat prices. Our observations point to the potentially critical effect of price elasticity of demand for livestock products on the success or failure of livestock disease control policies. We show the potential epidemiological benefits of (i) policies aimed at stabilizing livestock product prices, (ii) subsidies for alternative agricultural activities during epidemics, and (iii) diversifying agricultural production and sources of proteins available to consumers.

Indexed as

food safetygame theoryhealth economicslivestock productionprice theoryveterinary epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID36938540
PMCPMC10014248
OpenAlexW4324135102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read3
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.